Showing posts with label Lena Dunham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lena Dunham. Show all posts

Friday, April 07, 2017

Headlines


These headlines are real ... they have all been discovered on Internet news sites. Guess which ones came from Politico?

Media claims a scalp -- House Intel Chairman Nunes steps aside in Russia probe

Coulter: Obama should testify under oath on Trump surveillance

Report: White House backs Wall Street splitting of lending, investment banks ...

Bannon's departure solidifies McMaster's control over NSC

[As said on Lena Dunham's] HBO 'Girls': Unborn baby [is a] 'parasite growing inside of you'

Republicans push [nuclear option] button ...

Update: Shia movie sells three tickets ...

Muslim births to outpace Christian births within 20 years ...

Trump: Chemical attack in Syria 'crossed many, many lines'

Rare 'Pink Star' diamond becomes priciest diamond ever, sold for $71.2 million

Secret Service agent on Pence detail busted with hooker

Healthcare bust -- No deal as Congress goes into recess

Monday, February 13, 2017

The Resistance


We are living in interesting times wherein there is a strident and seemingly widespread resistance to our current Trump administration ... unfortunately even some of it from within the administration itself ... as witnessed by the continued embarrassing security leaks. The energy in this resistance over-states its actual support as much of Middle America seems to understand the time-worn dynamic of how those on the left ... much of the print media, many entertainers, some judges, SNL, paid agitators, prog politicians, cable TV talking heads, even some foreign leaders ... are over-reacting to a few greenhorn missteps by the Trump posse.

Many on the left ... Meryl Streep, Michael Moore, Al Franken, Rosie O'Donnell, Chuck Schumer, Lena Dunham, Mark Cuban, Elizabeth Warren, etc. ... are all elbowing each other out of the headlines ... fishing to be first in the public's eye with even more outrageous Trump and Company smears.

And John Hinderaker, like always, has it pretty much right in his Powerline Blog diagnosis of the double teaming that SNL and the AP perform almost every weekend since Trump was inaugurated. Their purpose has clearly expanded well beyond humor to delegitimizing our current administration ... see: Powerline Blog. This is verification of the extent and vigor of the resistance I am noting above. Somehow, I think that these naysayers will eventually tire of concocting their innuendo and fake news and Trump will prevail ... just like he did in the general election. He will "punch through" this picket line of pikers.

Friday, December 09, 2016

Lena Dumpham


Lena Dunham has become famous by being obnoxiously unorthodox ... kinda like a young Rosie O'Donnell ... both charter members of the Look-At-Me Club. She has made her spurs directing and appearing in the HBO program, "Girls" in which she bares her sorrowful soul and often her frumpy body. Now, after threatening to move to Canada if Trump were elected ... and then backing out when he was ... she has tried to recapture the spotlight by an Instagram posting of a selfie of herself sitting on the toilet ... see: Breitbart Story.

This is in the same style as her other shameless sameness. But she got my attention which suits her strange self loathing.

Saturday, November 12, 2016

Headlines


These headlines are real ... they have all been discovered on Internet news sites.

Stocks best week since 2011 ...

Some illegals already leaving the country ...

The sequel: Chelsea Clinton being groomed to run for Congress

Sidney Blumenthal: 'Right wing' FBI agents took down Hillary in a 'coup d'etat'

David Brooks: Trump will resign or be impeached within a year

Huma weeps in street ...

Trump calls slain cop's widow to offer condolences ...

[Lena Dunham] ... cops out on pledge to move to Canada

ESPN's viewership is tanking

Charles Barkley to angry NBA crowd: 'Give Trump 'a chance'

People burning New Balance sneakers  to protest company's Trump support

Yet another journalist calls for Trump's death

Saturday, October 01, 2016

What if ...


the Donald Trump/Mike Pence ticket wins in November? This upset victory might result in a number of interesting and maybe attractive developments:

- Hellary will divorce Bill and marry Huma

- Bill will devote his life to investigating female sex slave trafficking

- Barbara Streisand might move to Australia as promised

- Obummer will start his Family Foundation with the eventual intention of buying Kenya

- Newt Gingrich will be named Chief of Staff

- Mark Cuban will have lost a close friend

- Mar-a-Largo might become the summer White House

- Construction will start on the Keystone Excel pipeline

- Justice Ginsburg will not resign from the SCOTUS even when on a respirator

- Mexico will refuse to pay for the Wall

- Chris Christie will be named Attorney General

- The Clinton Foundation will have lost its major funding sources and may fold

- Rosie O'Donnell and Lena Dunham will move to Canada

- Melania Trump will attempt to buy back all her nudie photos

- Coal and other energy companies' stock prices will soar

- Paul Ryan and/or Jeb Bush might slit their wrists

- Bernie Sanders will retire to his new beach-front home

Thursday, August 04, 2016

What if?


What if Donald Trump won in November? The Hollywood Reporter's Michael Wolf drew a very sharp and interesting contrast on Morning Joe this AM between the backers of Clinton versus Trump ... their iconic standard bearers being respectively Lena Dunham versus the Duck Dynasty. This election is basically a contest between the inside versus the outside ... the two coasts versus fly-over country ... the transgenderites versus the Tea Party ... the globalists versus the nationalists ... hyphenated America versus Wheel of Fortune America. These two sides of this nation's cultural coin do not understand each other nor do they like each other. Actually this is not quite true. The outsiders have been living in the insiders' world for a good 25 years and they understand this milieu quite well. The opposite is not true. And, interestingly enough, the outsiders, I believe, are the vast majority of Americans. But the insiders have controlled things because of the historic apathy of the outsiders and through bias in the media, higher education and the entertainment industry.

Basically Donald Trump has based his campaign on appealing to the outsiders almost exclusively. When he eschews the insiders, like he did this past weekend, they go nuts. Insider (Mark Cuban) after insider (Meg Whitman) jumped ship and denounced Trump to the delight of the Clinton campaign and Barbara Streisand (just about the ultimate insider.) So Trump is telling those insider Republicans to pound sand ... he doesn't need them. Wow! That is a pretty gutsy move! This means that Trump believes that he can win without the cavalry ... the Republican establishment. Now most Democrats are gleefully predicting that this is suicidal ... as are many Republicans (not so gleefully). But Trump is undaunted ... and, since he has been ahead in the polls before, I think he believes that he can come back and take the prize.

Now back to my question ... what if he does win? Maybe a 40-60 shot. Obviously the insiders would be apoplectic. They would see their power eroding and their gravy train being derailed ... see: The Voice of the People. Trump may even slake some vengeance on some of his more vocal opponents. The Republican insiders in Congress would likely fight him at every turn ... depending on the size of his victory ... small margin, with vociferousness ... large margin, behind the scenes. But, being opportunists, I can imagine some Sander's Democrats actually supporting some of his populist agenda. Most of the media, of course, would slander him at every turn until, that is  until they went belly up. The business community ... at least the large business community ... would work at cross purposes with him. I suspect the small and medium businesses might actually support him. But, after his first conservative supreme court appointment, things might begin to calm down on the right.

I truly hope that most of the bleeding because of the Obummer agenda would be stopped. If Trump was able to surround himself with enough open-minded insiders who knew how to grease the wheels of government, then he might accomplish some real improvements to the tax system, immigration, regulations, entitlements, our military preparedness, etc. But he also might reveal his natural liberal sympathies and not do everything that his electors expect of him. For instance, in reforming Obamacare, he might well move us closer to a single-payer system. And I am sure he would do other things to piss off his voters. Internationally, other world leaders would not know how to deal with him ... so they would likely be gun shy. Relations with Russia, Egypt, Israel, Great Britain and Poland would warm. They would cool with China, Iran, France and North Korea. And I don't think he would win the Nobel Peace prize.

My biggest fear would be for his safety. Wannabe terrorist on the left and those of the Muslim faith would pose a real danger to Trump. Even famous names in entertainment might be incensed enough to try something foolish. I would hope that this threat could be neutralized ... but then who really knows?

Monday, December 08, 2014

Goose for the Gander


When the terms "rape" or "sexual assault" appear in the press these days (the meme that apparently keeps the main-stream media's blood flowing ... witness Bill Cosby's spotlight), the gender that is top of mind is female. This makes a certain amount of cultural sense in that females are generally thought to be weaker and more vulnerable (Lena Dunham being a major exception). However, when I just read that there are more male rapes in the military than female ones (raw numbers, not percentages), I was a little taken aback ... see: Enews Strory. And this then got me to thinking.

With Rolling Stone magazine's apology for its poor reporting in the University of Virginia fraternity gang-rape story, our current obsessive media focus on male sexual predation on females has taken a step backward. However, the huge numbers of males being raped in prisons usually engenders only unsympathetic snickers. And, if a female teacher is revealed as taking sexual advantage of one of her male students, the reaction is generally far more subdued than if the genders are reversed. Why this lopsided set of standards? Have we not been inculcated for the last fifty years that the sexes are equal in all respects? Should not female sports teams be wearing blue shoes in sympathy for the plight of male sexual victims?

In truth, goosing a gander should be just as serious an offense as gandering a goose (or gandering a gander).

Tuesday, November 04, 2014

Feel-Good Voting


If Lena Dunham is your guru, then I am confident you voted today for "D" candidates. This frumpy feminist has condensed five feel-good reasons for voting today into a flighty flyer for the feeble-minded. Basically these five reasons are centered on emotional issues and completely ignore the serious policy problems that are now plaguing our nation. If you can suffer vacuous vituperation and lady-parts logic, then take a few minutes to read the following inanities that try to eviscerate some of the more outstanding Republican Senate candidates … see: Women Are Watching.

This wonky woman is clearly a silly symptom of our looney-tunes times.

Wednesday, October 08, 2014

Related?

Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama's Mom)

Lena Dunham (Of "Girls")


Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Sarah Silverman


along with Jane Fonda and Lena Dunham, have just been honored by the Public Broadcasting System (PBS) as “Women Who Make America” … see: Haaretz Story. Now Ms. Silverman is a bit of an iconoclast and femi-nazi (a Rush Limbaugh term) so it is not surprising that she is being so honored.  But if you want to sample Ms. Silverman’s schtick take a gander at the following video clip (excuse the ad): Breitbart Video.  If you don’t find this just the tiniest bit offensive, then you have been watching too much Bill Maher.

Now, aren’t we all so proud and excited that politically-neutral PBS gets substantial taxpayer funding?