Liberal Arrows

According to Nancy Pelosi (and Elizabeth Warren?), America’s  liberals have a lot of arrows in their quivers to threaten who, for many years, have been spineless Republicans. Here are some of them so far identified (I’m sure there are many more arrows):

=> Make states out of Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia =  four more Democrat Senators

=> Accuse Republicans of being racists, homophobes or sexists ... often all three

=> Fulminate violent rioting and mayhem in the streets

=> Eliminate the filibuster rule in the Senate

=> Call Trump & Company white supremacist, Nazis, etc.

=> Impeach the President, the Attorney General, etc.

=> Obliterate the electoral college

=> Pull down statues, rename locales and cover our cities with graffiti both unsanctioned and sanctioned

=> Physically threaten conservatives with bodily harm

=> Stop enforcing the law in many of our major cities and defund the police


That is, this was the case until Donald Trump reminded us that we all have backbones.


STAND UP FOR AMERICA!

Pejoratives

Libs have lots of pejorative arrows in their quiver to besmirch their rivals  — racist, xenophobe, sexist, bigot, homophobe, Islamaphobe, anti-Semite and on and on. What is missing from this slime-line-up? Answer: a word for those poltroons who hate white people ... obviously including many self-loathing whites themselves.

Sooo ... this blog post will try to close this gap in these hateful nicknames. Perhaps one of the following:

- Anglo-Saxonist

- Caucasain’t

- White Shadow Banner

- Cracker Cruncher

- Albaphobe

- Casperist

- White-biter


Which do you prefer?

Headlines

Poll: Biden, Bernie, Beto lead 2020 Dem field

There is something about this market sell-off that no one is talking about: The strong dollar

Maxine Waters taunts Trump to 'keep his mouth shut' ...

Poll: 6ercent of Democrats say Republicans are 'racist,' 'bigoted,' 'sexist'

Theresa May: Brexit talks 'in the endgame'

Goldman's 'bear market risk indicator' signals returns will be zero the next twelve months

Jerry Brown blames Climate Deniers [for CA wildfires] ...

Jeb Bush accesses his appointee Brenda Snipes of breaking election laws

Defeated GOP lawmaker blames McCain's Obamacare vote for Demd' House takeover

Marvel Comics legend Stan Lee dead at 95

Justice Department  legal opinion to support Whitaker appointment ...

Turley: Dems will hit Trump with a 'storm of subpoenas'

A Poser

When Donard Trump fully converts to the Democrat party, is the Main Stream Media still going to accuse him of being a Nazi, a sexist, a racist, an anti-Semite, a white-supremacist, a xenophobe, an Islamophobe and a Putin cock holster? And are Comey and Mueller then going to slink off into the night? Also, will the seas then continue to recede? Finally, will he win the next Profiles in Courage Award from what is left of the Kennedy clan?

Headlines

These headlines are real ... they have all been discovered on Internet news sites.

Gov't plans to kill 45,000 wild horses ...

Clinton Doctor: all good, nothing to see

Coulter: Could Hillary tell us what percentage of Muslims are 'deplorable'?

Powell: 'Bohemian Grove attendees will vote against Trump' ...

European Parliament chief: 'Trump problem for the whole world' ...

What? Bill sez Hillary haz 'flu'

118,395,000 on government health insurance

Sessions: Obama's plan to import 110,000 refugees 'extreme, reckless'

Kim Jong-un has enough uranium to build 20 nukes THIS YEAR ...

Huffpo: Trump's plan to give women maternity time off is SEXIST

UPDATE: FBI Director says cover up your webcam ...

Merkel demands German firms hire unqualified immigrants -- quickly

Basket Case

According to Hellary Clinton, because I now support Donald Trump, there is a good chance that I am a xenophobe, a homophobe, a sexist, or a racist ... or, as she would like to shame me, one of the "basket of deplorables" ... see: CNN Story. (I think she might have also tagged us as being Islamophobic.) Now there is a slight possibility that I might have one or more of these "deplorable" traits ... but I am not stupid. I will not vote for this evil woman just to assuage myself of some smidgen of guilt for my supposed prejudice. Unfortunately, there must be many Americans who would pull her lever as penance for their thought sins ... otherwise why would she trot out this ugly campaign tactic?

To me, this attempt to emulate her predecessor and further divide Americans is nothing more than a sign of desperation on her part. The polls have tightened up and even a few free-thinkers in the liberal media are asking her tough questions. Even though she can still raise oodles of "access money" on Martha's Vineyard, Southampton and Hollywood, she can only draw sparse audiences wherever she tries to rally her base ... suggesting that, unless the graves open up again like they did for Obummer, her voter turnout may not come close to matching Trump's ... whose rallies are always overflowing with enthusiastic supporters.

No, Hellary, you will not cow me into voting for you ... nor will I try to buy access to your criminal enterprise. You typify almost everything that is wrong with our political system today. Although Donald Trump also has his share of faults, next to you, he is St. Peter.

Bimbo Eruption

I hope that this doesn't occur ... but assume for a moment that the presidential race next year is between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton ... and Hillary, being true to her word, accuses Trump of being a sexist in the war on women. Now,Trump with his unlimited funds enters the first debate with Hillary by assembling a group of women whom Hillary's husband, Bill Clinton, had sexually assaulted ... and whom Hillary had helped to smear with her "bimbo eruptions unit."

Here are the names of just a few of those "bimbos" ... Gennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Kathleen Willey, Monika Lewinsky, Juanita Broaddrick, Eileen Wellstone, Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Regina Hopper Blakely, Sandra Allen James, Kathy Bradshaw, Sally Perdue, Dolly Kyle Browning and Carolyn Moffet. Want more? The list is almost interminable ... see: Alamo Girl Listing. (Maybe Trump can't get Lewinsky.)

Anyhow, The Donald flies them all to the debate venue in his big black Trump plane and puts them in the front row of the audience referring to them repeatedly during the debate, causing the TV cameras to repeatedly scan this lineup ... and then makes them all available to the national press in the Spin Room after the debate ... encouraging them to tell their stories of how Hillary was an enabler to Bill, the archetypal sexist.

Now that would be a true bimbo eruption ...

Pushback

If one points out that illegal immigration is destroying America's social fabric and threatening our middle class, one is a xenophobe. If one pushes back against the clear excesses of the gay community, one is a homophobe. If one worries out loud that Muslim extremists want to convert the rest of the world into a caliphate, one is an Islamophobe. If one decries President Obama's abuse of power and his ignoring of our Constitution, one is a racist. If one shows that global warming has not occurred for 16 years and that the data is now being cooked to cover this fact, one is a denier. If one points out that women in America have it pretty darn good, one is a sexist.

And if one pushes back against such pejorative labels. saying that they do noting but encourage even more outrageous behavior from these groups, one is a curmudgeon and a misanthrope

The burden of these constant bombastic labels is getting too much for me and for the majority of Americans who just want to go along to get along, so I have decided to follow the crowd and, from now on, I am going to zip my lip.

NOT!

New Newspeak

This blogger, along with many other commentators, have noticed how we have slipped into a "1984" type attempt by our Orwellian government to control our thoughts and lives ... in particular its increasing onerous conscription of permissible language. (Have you heard anyone from the Obama administration use the term "radical Islam" or use ISIS instead of ISIL?)

Now we are treated to what we are in for if Queen Hillary becomes the next POTUS. Just yesterday her posse released a list of words that are verboten for reporters to use in her possible upcoming campaign ... see: Daily Caller Story. Whereas, under Obama, such dog-whistle words were racist, now they are sexist. So you have been warned!

Rather than just list these words, I will herein use them in defiance of these Clinton conscriptions. If anyone sees me being gagged and put in a car trunk by James Carville, you will see first-hand the results of my defiance. (Hillary's taboo words are in italics in the following.)

Hillary Clinton certainly has been secretive about her stint at the State Department. By setting up her own e-mail server she clearly felt entitled to circumvent the rules by which the rest of the world lives. Her disingenuous and calculating U.N. press-conference explanation of this scandal has been very polarizing in the media ... with even many liberal talking heads saying that she was insincere and clearly over confident. Ever since she glommed onto Bill Clinton in Yale law school, she has been extremely ambitious for them both ... but more and more she represents the past and has grown increasingly out of touch with middle America. And it is so blatantly obvious that she will do anything to win.

Fruitcake

At the risk of being labeled a fruitcake, yesterday on a Skype call with friends, I suggested that Sarah Palin might be a good Presidential candidate for the Republicans in 2016.  Here is my logic:

American voters, as a rule, are clearly “uninformed.”  In 2008, they emotionally chose Barack Obama because he was, to use Harry Reid’s words, a “light-skinned African-American with no Negro dialect.”  This was to prove to themselves that this country was no longer racist … and that, by electing Obama, the stain of slavery would be forever cleansed.  And then they re-elected him in 2012 … despite the fact that he had proven himself of poor Presidential timber … using much of the same mindless naivete.

Now as we approach 2016, I believe that emotion will once again rule the American electorate … and this time they will feel that it is a woman’s turn to be President … independent of any consideration of competence or character.  I think that this will be the Democrat party’s strategy in putting forward Hillary Clinton.  It is her turn … and, barring any major scandal (maybe even with one), she should be a shoe in. 

I believe them right and the only defense against such an emotional appeal would be for the Republicans to also proffer a woman … perhaps Sarah Palin.  Yes, I know that much of the American media would have a field day sniping at her … much as they did in 2008.  But then they did exactly the same when Ronald Reagan was nominated … painting him as a know-nothing thespian … and he was elected in a landslide.  Since 2008, Ms. Palin has been annealed in the oven of national politics and has made virtually no blunders.  I’m sure she has even read some periodicals.

Ms. Palin clearly is a true-blue conservative … much like Reagan was … and unfortunately, no male Republican candidate would be able to debate Hillary on even terms.  Even Chris Christie, I’m afraid would be hobbled in his confrontational style when pitted against Hillary.  All she would need to do would be to mist up and Christie would be toast.  On the other hand, Sarah Palin would be on level ground and would be able to point out Hillary’s many fault lines without appearing sexist.  She should be able to hold her own in any debate ... and Hillary would get mushy at her own peril. 

Sometimes political parties need to go with the popular flow … and actually eat some of last-Christmas’s fruitcake.  It might even taste good.

Afterward: If Sarah Palin were to run, she obviously would have a long row to hoe ... if this brickbat is an example ... see: Breitbart Reference.