Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poverty. Show all posts

Monday, December 04, 2017

Headlines


All from Internet news sites. Guess which ones from Drudge?

Fear in London as acid attacks soar ...

Trump keeps playing nice with Mueller, for now

Mattis: The enemy is collapsing faster than the media predicted

Trump says never asked Comey to stop investigating Flynn

Revealed: Trump hater on Mueller team

Western governors shrug off Flynn furor

[Trump:] Russian collusion? Take a look at what went on during Obama's terms

Welcome to the age of million-dollar poverty

President's Gallup poll plunge: 62% disapproval ...

Trump plans to declare Jerusalem the capital of Israel

Puerto Rico won't have full power for two months later than predicted

Police search for driver who struck 4 in NYC: killing 1, injuring 3

Thursday, November 23, 2017

History Lesson


The persistence of Socialism (and its evil twin, Communism) is one of the best examples of mankind's stubborn inability to learn from the difficult lessons of history. This, of course, advantages those who can fathom the counterintuitive nature of Capitalism -- Greed creates Wealth, whereas Charity creates Poverty.

Tuesday, February 07, 2017

UN Scorecard


Should the United States keep supporting the Utopian notion of a benign world government which will save our planet from the rigors of war, illness, poverty and tyranny? Well the United Nations has been around for over 70 years and needs to receive an evaluation of its efficacy. Here, thanks to my wife, are a set of pluses and minuses that I think pretty much tell the story:

The 9 greatest UN achievements (see: The Flame Tally for details):
  • Food aid
  • Aid to refugees
  • Protecting children
  • Peacekeeping
  • Running elections
  • Reproductive health and population management
  • War crime prosecutions
  • Fighting AIDS
  • Bringing invisible issues to the forefront

The UN's 10 greatest failures (see: List Verse Tally for details):
  • Terrorism
  • Nuclear proliferation
  • Sri Lanka
  • Child sex abuse scandal
  • Veto power
  • Srebrenica massacre
  • Khmer Rouge
  • The Cold War
  • Darfur
  • Rwanda

(I could easily add another half-dozen negatives ... including its mishandling of the Ebola outbreaks.)


Does this tally sheet justify the billions that we spend yearly on this bloated and corrupt institution?

Thursday, October 02, 2014

How Come?


-        Terrorists never seem to suffer post-traumatic stress disorder?

-        President Obama always finds out about his administration problems from the news media?

-        The Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL) is not associated with Islam?

-        Tsunamis after under-seas earthquakes are being caused by climate change?

-        President Putin of Russia can’t afford a shirt?

-        Poverty in the United States doesn’t diminish no matter how much is spent to eradicate it?

-        So many Catholic priests sexually prey on children?

-        Only Republicans abuse women? (Afterward ... see: Breitbart Story.)

-        European nations hardly spend any money on national-defense?

-        California doesn’t go bankrupt?

-        U.S. environmental protesters always leave a mess behind?

-        Racial demonstrations generally involve looting?

-        The social media craze is anti-social?

-        Hollywood morality preachers are too often immoral?

-        Hillary Clinton is so politically popular?

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

Progressivism


The Ken Burns' documentary "The Roosevelt's" has spent considerable time on Teddy Roosevelt's progressive reforms (trust busting, pure food and drugs, civil service hiring, land conservation, etc.) ... most of which are universally lauded today.  And T.R. has had his likeness carved on Mount Rushmore as a consequence.

This has got me musing ... there is one fundamental flaw with the progressive agenda ... and that is ... after the most obvious beneficial reforms have been enacted, many "progressives" think that any change is still necessarily good. Thus change becomes an objective in and of itself … with little thought to the possible consequences. If the progressive movement was right in Teddy Roosevelt’s time, then it must still be the bright path to lasting political fame.

Once most or all of the low-hanging progressive fruit has been plucked, then progressives find sillier and sillier things that must be reformed ... many of which begin to erode the very fabric of our society. Many of these inane progressive fixes have more to do with changing social norms rather than fixing structural economic problems. Here are a few:

- Poverty is a primary target of the progressive movement … with transfer payments of all types now totaling hundreds of billions of dollars annually. The result? This country now has a huge indolent class which is now totally dependent on these government handouts … and unwilling to seek gainful employment. Yet they are still indigent because “poverty” keeps being defined upwards and most of those transfer payment are not included in such measurements. And this growing unproductive population then requires millions of immigrants to take their places at an additional economic and socially-disruptive cost. And this is called progress …

- Progressives have now determined that the government cannot now intrude into the bedroom to define deviant and often destructive moral conduct ... yet it can and must intercede to pay for the consequences of such questionable morality ... contraceptives, an AIDs cure, abortions, redefining marriage, sex-change operations, etc. So far pedophilia, bestiality, incest, and polygamy have escaped such social "progress" but, if such progressive trends continue ...

- Progressives have also decided, on very dubious “scientific" evidence, that carbon dioxide, a gas that is the basis of all life on earth, is a pollutant and must be regulated with punitive economic policies. This would be the equivalent to Teddy Roosevelt, because of the then unsanitary slaughterhouse practices, outlawing meat.

- Gender and sexual-orientation equality has morphed in the progressive mind to gender and sexual-orientation equivalence. Women are now encouraged to serve in military combat roles. Men who think of themselves as women must be allowed to intermingle with women in all their erstwhile segregated places ... and visa versa. Did Teddy, the archetypical progressive have women serving with him in the Rough Riders?

Has ‘progressivism” now devolved into something bad instead of something good? To me it has …