Yesterday, the United States' Attorney General, Eric Holder, addressed the NAACP convention and made his pitch to negate the "stand your ground" laws in many states. He based this appeal upon the outcome of the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman trial where, as it turns out, this law was never claimed as a defense by Zimmerman's lawyers. Never you mind. Even though Holder obviously knew this, he was clearly confident that his audience and the American public didn't. So he assumed the majority of American voters would not notice such demagoguery and, except for Fox News and some radio talk shows, they didn't. All around the country, sleazy politicians, over-paid athletes, nebbish news makers, ego-maniacal movie stars and others wishing to get into or stay in the spotlight are using George Zimmerman's acquittal as a way of burnishing their images with America's dumbed-down
populus.
The one notable exception, believe it or not, was former President, Jimmy Carter, who thought the verdict was justified ... based upon the charges and the facts ... see:
Politico Story. It seems about ever ten years or so Jimmy gets it right ... but not so the case with Hillary Clinton's $200,000 30-minute sisterhood speech ... see:
Another Politico Story.
To me, our majority-moronic electorate is a very frightening demographic. If such nose-picking behavior has become the norm in our society, how will we ever retain our military, economic, and moral hegemony in the world? I sadly suppose we won't ... unless things change. Perhaps, instead of encouraging absolutely everyone to vote (sometimes more than once), it might be a good idea to limit future voter eligibility by using some reasonable metric of perspicacity? Perhaps, what was Hillary Clinton's former job? Or where is Benghazi? Or, within a few trillion dollars, how big is our national debt? (But not, who is Justin Bieber?!)
