Dartblog author Joseph Asch is a tiny bit of a Luddite in
his comments about on-line education at Dartmouth. In referencing a New York
Times article in his recent blog, he points out, as does the Times, the
repeated current failings of this new approach to education … see: Dartblog Opinion. I, myself, have often seen shortfalls in the
massive open on-line course's (MOOC's) approach whilst tutoring at a high school
west of Boston. However, I believe that
MOOC is an economic necessity and must eventually win out as the preferred mode
of pedagogy.
For this to occur, I believe that the following wrinkles
need to be ironed out:
-
The courses need to be better attuned to the potential
of the on-line environment. This
includes instructive animations/videos, hyperlinks to vetted sources, and oral
questions and feedback responses.
-
There also needs to be better paced instruction,
peer-reviewed content, and testing that stays within the boundaries of the
course material.
-
I also believe that Skype-like and even
social-network-like interactions with the instructors and other students will
greatly increase the learning potential.
These interactions can be in real-time or even on a scheduled-delay
basis.
-
The use of celebrities and well-known-experts (ala
Sesame Street and Jeopardy) to capture the imagination of the on-line student
might bring greater focus to the subject at hand.
-
A feedback mechanism for MOOC students need to be more
obvious. Perhaps a running ranking of a
given student versus his/her peers? Or a
monetary reward in the form of a scholarship for outstanding achievement?
-
MOOC courses also should be constructed with the intent
to encourage students to strike out on their own to do independent research or make
real-life connections with a view toward a career (even in such things as the
traditional manual trades).
-
And lastly, there also needs to be a face or
fingerprint type recognition system to verify exactly who is on the receiving
end of this on-line instruction.
Otherwise there is too much opportunity for fraud
No comments:
Post a Comment