I wrote earlier today about the secret society of lefty
journalists called Gamechanger Salon (somewhat pretentious name, no? … see:
Fletcher's Castoria Blog.) This has got me ruminating on what is occurring in news reporting in
general. As I understand it, reporters are meant to provide their audience the
essence … the who, what, when, where and how of a news story … preferably early
on … but not necessarily the why. Now, often the lede of a news story is the imagined why
and one has to sift through many filler paragraphs to find these other facts …
if they are there at all. Too often reporters tend to squash other essential and
needed facts for the sake of political correctness.
I recall reading a while back a survey done on the entering
students at the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism … and the primary
motivation of these tyros was to change society for the better (obviously
“better” being a relative term.) In other words, rather than reliably and truthfully
reporting the facts of what was occurring in the world, they wanted to change the game. And it appears that
Columbia University ... and many other such schools ... do little to change this
misguided ambition. I believe that this is a noxious notion of what
reporting is supposed to be … and has grown mainly from Woodward and
Bernstein’s Watergate news reporting which brought down President Nixon.
Every cub reporter now wants to emulate this dynamic duo …
and lead our society out of the sewer and into his/her own version of utopia. Such scooping of the world will result in a Pulitzer
Prize and then fame and riches beyond imagination. This is a little like a grandstanding
playground basketball player imagining himself as the next LeBron James.
Instead of pursuing a respectable career within ethical and professional
boundaries, many reporters are now trying to become another Walter Cronkite and
“making a difference” like this CBS News anchorman did by humiliating LBJ. And so they join the Gamechangers Salon.
Opinion journalists may do this ... but not reporters. There should be an enormous gulf between the two ... which has now been conveniently blurred. And, journalists of any stripe should not be forming cabals.
(I think that H.L. Mencken also said that any newsman who has more than just a handful of mourners at his funeral was not a good journalist.)
