Showing posts with label GNP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GNP. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Headlines


Democrats say 'O! Yes!' to Winfrey

[J.P. Morgan's Jamie] Dimon predicts 4% GNP growth ...

Leaked memo reveals Dems refusing spending votes if no DACA fix

... Ivanka praises [Oprah's] 'empowering' Globes speech ...

Is Trump mentally fit? Don't count on physical to tell you

Wolff admits: Didn't interview any WH Caabinet officials for book ...

Expensive US spy satellite presumed lost after SpaceX mission hoes awry

Tillerson: Trump will either 'fix or cancel' Iran nuclear deal

Trump greeted by mix of cheers and boos at NCAA title game

Roseanne: I'd be better president than Oprah!

FBI blows up theory of 'sonic attacks' against diplomats in Cuba

Hershel Walker: 'Trump getting raw deal. We have to respect him as our president.'

Wednesday, December 20, 2017

Euclidean Proof


Theorem: Trump has already shown himself to be a better president than Obama (or, by extension,  Hillary)

Postulate: Trump's policies, in almost every arena, are diametrically opposed to Obama/Hillary's

Axiom: The American Judiciary is returning to its Constitutional role of interpreting the laws

Axiom: GNP growth under Trump is better than 3% vs. under 2% with Obama

Axiom: The American stock market (Dow) is up 7,000 points (38%) since Trump's election

Axiom: Unemployment is at historic lows despite many more workers entering the labor force

Axiom: The ISIS caliphate in Iraq and Syria has finally been obliterated

Lemma: Increasingly, America is reestablishing its global leadership and hegemony

Axiom: First major tax overhaul in 31 years

Axiom: There has been a dramatic drop in government regulations

Axiom: Illegal immigration is down while deportations of criminals is way up

Lemma: Unfavorable trade agreements are being renegotiated

Axiom: The U.S. military and nuclear arsenal are being revitalized

Ergo: Being that his policies are the anthisis of Obama's, Trump's winners have been far better for America than Obama's or would-be Hillary's.

Friday, May 26, 2017

The 2% Solution


Yesterday, President Donald Trump chastised the many members of the NATO alliance for not living up to their commitment to spend 2% of their GNP n defense. Of NATO's 28 members only Great Britain, Estonia, Greece, Poland and the United States are meeting or exceeding this commitment. For decades the other 23 countries, including France and Germany, have shirked this commitment without recourse ... relying on the United States to pick up the slack. And when Trump reminded those slackers of their deficiencies, the representative from Luxembourg turned the Macron, the President of France, with a hand-covered snide remark and a snicker ... see: Fox News Video. To me, this is the height of sophomoric haughtiness. Perhaps Trump will find a way to remind this Euro-jerk of America's part in the history of  20th Century Europe.

And I have a prediction ... yes, some of these countries now in default (I'm thinking France and Germany) will find a way of meeting this NATO treaty obligation ... but do it with accounting tricks and not with genuine military buildups. Wait and see.

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

The Grasshoppers


I know that John Hinderaker is generally my go-to guy at the Powerline blog, but Paul Mirengoff has a very pity entry on the debt debacle in Greece ... see: Greek Farce Explained. In this posting, Paul quotes a lot of the inside skinny about how the Greek poobahs misplayed their hands at the financing negotiations with the rest of the European Economic Community (EEC). Talk about the JV playing against the L.A. Lakers. This arrogant bunch of lefties from Athens carried with them there the grasshopper's attitude that the world owed them a living. They may have learned a very hard lesson ... which I don't think is over yet.

I myself have a few comments on these Mirengoff revelations:

- How can Finland be made to adsorb such of heavy burden of this Greek indebtedness? This posting reveals that this country is being asked to pay out 10% of its annual budget and 2.5% of its GDP to hold Greece's head above water. This can't be fair. If the rest of the EEC ponied up the same relative amounts, I suspect that this would cover Greece's shortfall many times over.

- How can the EEC or the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lend Greece any more money when they know that they are not going to repay what has already been lent? Yes I know that the formation of the Euro has benefited Northern Europe, mainly Germany, greatly ... GNP growth-wise. But nevertheless, if you have to lend someone money to buy your products ... and you know that this debt will never be repaid ... this seems a silly commercial strategy.

- The U.S. generally has assumed an attitude that all this European economic kerfuffle does not affect us. But we forget that we contribute something like 18% to the IMF funding ... so what the IMF loses, we also partly lose.

Isn't rather ironic that present-day Greeks seem to have forgotten Aesop's lesson from "The Grasshopper and the Ant?"


Thursday, January 13, 2011

Enter the Dragon


I am very far from being an expert on China. This usually doesn’t stop me from leaping in with my thoughts though. So, I will here offer a few naive views on this country … mainly because the rhetoric is beginning to climb elsewhere. Many believe that, because of its geographic size, massive population, exploding economy, high repository of native intelligence augmented by a good educational system, and apparent national energy, China is destined to dominate the world (economically) in a matter of only ten to twenty years (see the CNBC article ). This may be so but, according to many pundits in the 1980’s, wasn’t Japan also going to dominate things … remember "Japan Inc." Like Japan, China may also suffer a few hiccups on its way to world domination.

Let’s look at a few statistics. China’s land area is 3,696,100 square miles versus 1,656,425 for the United States. China’s population is over 1.6 billion people versus the U.S.’s only around 309 million. However, the U.S.’s GNP is close to $13.8 trillion, currently growing at about 1% per annum. China’s somewhat suspicious GNP numbers are $4.2 trillion, growing at around 10% per year. More interestingly the GNP per capita in China is about $870 whereas, in the U.S. it is over $33 thousand … quite a gap. But just imagine what China’s GNP would be if the per capita number was even $10,000.

There are a number of things that worry me about this Dragon of the East. They are:

1 - The possibility of another Cold War. China has, for a number of years been building up it military capabilities (see the Guardian article) including the recent boast that it will be able to take out (U.S.) aircraft carriers. It will not be too long before U.S. military strategists will need to respond to these threats with significantly increased defense spending on our part … probably post-Obama. This Cold War will (does) include China’s causing mischief with surrogate states like North Korea, Iran and Venezuela,

2 - At some point in the not too distant future, I would expect China to annex some additional territory (as they once did with Tibet) like parts of Mongolia or even Taiwan. I’m not sure that the United States (or Russia) knows exactly what we (it) will do when this circumstance presents itself.

3 - China’s one-baby-per-couple policy has caused the birth rate in China to be reduced. However, the ratio of male to female babies is now about 6 to 4. This presents a dangerous demographic situation when all these males reach maturity. Certainly domestic crime rates or even military adventures seem far more likely under such a situation (see my tongue-in-the-cheek blog on this subject, Another Modest Proposal).

4 - Walmart has greatly helped China keep its economy and employment growing. However, it won’t be too long before we in the United States stop stuffing our house with goods made in China. Here, I am not criticizing the quality of Chinese products. I am more criticizing the penchant of the American consumer to purchase things that they truly don’t need. I kid my wife that the next time she returns from the Christmas Tree Store with a bunch of discretionary stuff, our house is going to explode. When this U.S. consumer buying mania abates, China will have more difficulty (unless it has its own explosion of consumerism) keeping its population employed. This is a situation that will auger (poorly) for increased citizen unrest.

5 - To me, China’s fatal flaw is its lack of democracy and political freedom. I know that we, in this country, feel superior to China because of this national defect on its part. However, what will happen if they decide to shuck these chains? I would both feel good but then know that the days of U.S.’s world dominance are surely numbered.

And when was the last time you saw a bald eagle flying off with a dragon in its talons?