Showing posts with label AT&T. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AT&T. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Headlines


All from Internet news sites. Guess which from the Daily Caller?

Liberals turn on Franken

Top Democrat [John Conyers] used taxpayer money to pay off sexual accuser

Thorn in the Rose: CBS anchor accused, suspended

Newsweek compares Donald Trump to Charles Manson

FCC plans total repeal of net neutrality rules

Justice Department asks Supreme Court to protect Trump's extreme vetting policy

NYT White House reporter suspended after sexual harassment claims ...

US sues to block AT&T-Time Warner mega merger ...

DeBlasio: I agree with Gillibrand that Clinton should have resigned

Nearly half of the 2017 Rhodes Scholars are social justice activists

Merkel signals new elections after coalition collapse ...

LlAPD investigating nearly two dozen sex crime cases tied to Hollywood figures

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Headlines


These headlines are real ... they have all been discovered on Internet news sites.

Ryan up for defunding sanctuary cities ...

Paul Ryan: Illegals can stay ... Push to protect 'Dreamers' ...

Cubans: Obama 'screwed' us ... Revenge for Trump win ...

Intelligence Committee will investigate possible Russia-Trump links

Biological warfare: Madonna protests Trump ... with stylized pubic hair

AT&T to spin off CNN?

Iran approved to import another 130 tons of uranium ...

Woman given probation over rape of 13-year-old boy

Dukakis: Trump ought to get off that Twitter thing

Rubio choice: Back Trump or back down on Tillerson?

Joe Biden walks back comments that Donald Trump is unqualified to be president

California bullet train heading for multi-billion dollar overrun ...

Thursday, November 13, 2014

Net Neutrality


President Obama has now stated that net neutrality will be the Internet policy of his administration, but this position is understandably creating waves … see: Breitbart Story. I have discerned that “net neutrality,” like much in the current government, is a term meant to mislead. It is far from being neutral … just like the “Affordable Care Act” is far from being affordable. I do understand that, as a conservative, I should be opposed to this attempt to control this unfettered industry … see: Huffington Post Story. But I do somehow, deep down, feel a need to establish a few reasonable rules of the road ... as there clearly have been some abuses.

But I am also chary about letting a deceitful administration, such as Obama’s, take the reins to create such rules. These control freaks have proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted not to play favorites and self-deal in such situations. I can imagine a favored Google or Microsoft getting even more customer unfriendly in such an environment.

Much of the current smaller Internet industry players are vehemently opposed to net neutrality because they rightfully fear that newer regulations and price controls will stifle innovative opportunities. Established big players see net neutrality as an opportunity to leverage their lofty positions and are therefore mostly in favor of it. But unfortunately the uncertainty of what is to happen has also frozen many companies from making expensive gambles. AT&T has indicated its unwillingness to expand its fiber-optic network until such time as the issue of net neutrality is resolved … see: CNBC Article.

But, in the end, I suppose that the thing that colors my opinion the most on this issue is how slowly the telephone industry evolved as an utility under full government regulation. Using this as a model, I can imagine that, had net neutrality been adopted twenty years ago, we still might all be saddled with dial-up Internet service.

Therefore, I think I must be counted as being in the opposition ... at least for the nonce.

Afterward: Here are more repercussions over Obama's taking sides in this net neutrality dust up: Etrade Story.

After Afterward: To see Ted Cruz's position on net neutrality read: Business Insider Story.