Showing posts with label Peter King. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Peter King. Show all posts

Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Headlines


Hong Kong police shoot protester, man set afire

Boeing expects 737 Max deliveries to resume next month, sending shares higher

Race to replace [smart] phones with [smart] glasses

China tell Pompeo to address his ‘incorrect’ Cold War thinking

Republican’s used to ignore Trump’s resorts. Now they’re spending millions.

Alibaba breaks Singles Day record with more than $38 billion in sales

After push from Perry, backers got huge gas deal in Ukraine ...

Transcript reveals that Gordon Sondland never knew if any ‘quid pro quo’

GOP Rep. Peter King says he won’t seek re-election

Mark Cuban is the latest billionaire to bash Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s wealth tax plan

Global warming on hold: Winter comes early to Windy City ...

Joe Biden on gun control: We protect geese better than school kids

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Headlines


Distrustful, desperate and forgotten: a recipe for [NC Republican] voter fraud

Treasury Secretairy Stephen Mnuchin under consideration to become Trump's new chief of staff

Heavy snow pounds south ... entire season's snowfall -- in one day!

Comey admits dossier unverified months after FISA warrant granted

Why the greens are turning away from a carbon tax

Asia stocks decline after China reports weak trade data, Japan falls more than 2 percent

McCarthy: [Trump] Likely to be indicted by Manhattan US attorney ...

Lindsey Grahan to Trump: 'Dig in; don't give in' on border wall

Lighthizer: Huawei case 'totally separate' ftom U.S.- China [trade] talks

U.S. trade rep Lighthizer warns 90-day pause in U.S.-China trade wae is a 'hard deadline'

Beijing summons US ambassador over Huawei ...

[Peter] King: Third of country would see impeachment as 'revenge'

Sunday, November 23, 2014

Crow


Liberals are crowing (see: AP Story and Washington Post Story for their slant) and conservatives (including myself) are asked to eat crow as a result of the Friday's surprising House of Representatives Intelligence Committee's report on the Benghazi attack on 9/11/12. This report seems to dismiss that there were any intelligence failings leading up to this attack, deny that there were any "stand down" orders during this attack, and partially justify Susan Rice's claims about an Internet video being the motivation for these attacks (when she went on five Sunday talk shows shortly after the attack.)

However, there is obviously some push back from conservative commentators (see: Powerline Story and the more powerful Breitbart Story) who point out many of the issues and contradictions that were not answered in this Friday report. I myself am willing to eat some of that cornfield blackbird depending on a few outstanding questions. 1) Why would conservatives on this committee like Michele Bachmann and Peter King sign on to this report without any exceptions voiced? Are there intelligence issues that would be uncovered if all the facts were to be finally aired? And 2) Will Representative Trey Gowdy's Special Committee investigating Benghazi now fold its tent as a result of this other House committee's findings (see: Western Journalism Story) or will it soldier on?

My knife and fork are poised ...

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Eating Their Young


Earlier this year, in order to distract the American public from President Obama's dismal job performance, the Democrat attack machine castigated Romney over his leadership at Bain Capital,  But when Cory Booker, Democrat Mayor of Newark, NJ, defended Romney's performance at Bain Capital, he was forced by the Democrat consiglieries to walk back these comments within twenty-four hours.  Ditto for the Democrat governor of Massachusetts, Deval Patrick ... and even ... gasp ... Bill Clinton ... all with similar u-turns.

But, when Mitt Romney, criticized the State Department's previous day's embarrassing apology in dealing with the mob attacks on the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, he has once again came under the rabid harassment of the left-wing media.  And when he suffered a brief spat of stuttering when responding to the coordinated media strikes by reporters in his later-in-the-day press conference, his trashing was intensified.  (Of course, Obama has never has never had a spat of stuttering.)  Even more disturbing, instead of rallying around their candidate, a number of Republicans found it convenient to ding Romney ... in particular John Sununu (see: American Thinker Comments).  Ditto Republicans, Peter King and Peggy Noonan.

As opposed to supporting their party and their candidate, erudite Republicans (such as George Will) often try to earn their stripes and the favor of the Washington elite by eating their young.  I suppose that they often do this because, unlike the Democrat party, Republicans slake no vengeance on those who fall out of line.  Perhaps they should learn to do so?