In his column in the New York Times Paul Krugman, that loopy left-wing Nobel prize winning economist (who believes that our $18 trillion debt is not a national problem), has endorsed Donald Trump as the Republican candidate whose economic views are the closest to his own: see: Powerline Blog. (However, he still can't resist calling Trump an ignorant blowhard Does this mean that he is also one?) Perhaps he is trying his feeble best to sink Trump's presidential chances one way or the other?
Showing posts with label Paul Krugman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Paul Krugman. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 08, 2015
Strange Bedfellows?
In his column in the New York Times Paul Krugman, that loopy left-wing Nobel prize winning economist (who believes that our $18 trillion debt is not a national problem), has endorsed Donald Trump as the Republican candidate whose economic views are the closest to his own: see: Powerline Blog. (However, he still can't resist calling Trump an ignorant blowhard Does this mean that he is also one?) Perhaps he is trying his feeble best to sink Trump's presidential chances one way or the other?
Sunday, September 14, 2014
The Liberal Mind
From the Powerline Blog bounced from the Coyote Blog comes the above Venn diagram which cleverly concocts the confounding contortions of the liberal mind (relative to supply and demand).
Wednesday, April 10, 2013
Not Not No
Of late I
have been plagued by a gnawing feeling of angst … and trying to decipher what
is at its source. To allay this feeling, I wanted to find what is in disarray in our public space. Clearly there are excesses everywhere one looks -- huge sovereign debt, not just in the
United States but worldwide; rampant drug use; a socially-transmitted disease
pandemic (see: Were Number One); a galloping moral permissiveness (mostly centered in the media, Hollywood
and Washington); governmental
dysfunction at almost every level; parcels of pissant people impinging upon our
freedoms; the accelerating crumbling of our time-honored social structures …
enough … I’m sure you can easily extend this list.
After some sleeplessness I think I may have a clue as to what is the wellspring of my anxiety …
we are rapidly losing our ability to say “no.”
Saying “no” has become a big no-no.
The Republicans are being tarred in the media with the pejorative “The
Party of No.” We are told that everything new should be
unthinkingly embraced. Permissiveness is how to be hip. Saying “yes” (to anything) is what is
expected ... and makes one instantly brilliant and popular.
How should
we respond if someone, who can’t afford it, applies for a home mortgage? What do we say to our tween girls who want a personal
cache of “morning after” pills? Should
Jon Corzine get away Scott free after his firm “loses” billions of his clients’
money? Can we allow our government
unfettered access to our personal records?
Should we look away when politicians abuse their positions of power … or
waste billions of taxpayer dollars? Mr.
Paul Krugman, is it OK to run trillion dollar federal government deficits year
after year? Was Hillary Clinton right, in her Benghazi testimony, when she shouted, "What difference does it make?" Mr. Ben Bernanke, is it
permitted for the Federal Reserve to have printed more than four trillion dollars of
new money?
Recognizing
this contemporary societal flaw has set me free. I can now view the world through puce-colored
glasses … without being self-conscious. I
can now shake my head from side to side with unfettered abandon. So the next time I am accused of being a
sour-puss and a nay-sayer, I intend to secretly smile to myself.
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Why We Are Bombing Libya
Who will be the first to condemn President Obama for trading blood for oil? Rachel "Mad Dog" Maddow? Chris "Tingle up My Leg" Matthews? Paul "Useful Idiot" Krugman? Keith "Over the Top" Olbermann? Mika "Ms. Smirker" Brzezinski? Bill "Fifth Column" Moyers? David "Go for the Throat" Gregory?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




