Showing posts with label involuntary manslaughter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label involuntary manslaughter. Show all posts

Saturday, December 02, 2017

San Francisco Justice

Pillar of Salt

San Francisco is a beautiful city (except for the little brown presents from all its many homeless people.) However, it counterbalances this scenic beauty with the ugliness of the general population and its sanctuary city hubris. Case in point -- a jury drawn from this city's moonbat pukes on Thursday found Jose Garcia Zarate (a five-times deported illegal Mexican alien with seven outstanding criminal convictions) not guilty on all significant charges (murder, involuntary manslaughter, and assault with a deadly weapon) in the Kate Steinle murder trial. Zarate's high-priced lawyer's shifting defense was that he had "found the gun under a bench wrapped in rags an it went off accidentally." And this San Francisco jury swallowed this tripe hook, line and sinker. See: Washington Post Article for all the tainted details. Not even involuntary manslaughter!

This travesty of justice indicates to me that there is no hope for this city by the bay ... and, when it slides into the sea, remember, those of you who are fleeing, don't look back ...

Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Insurrection


The Justice for Mike Brown facebook activist group has just published a list of sixty-seven targets not to be looted, rioted at, or somehow violated if the verdict of the grand jury in the Ferguson, Missouri shooting case disappoints … follow this link for the specific targets: The Gateway Pundit Story. This list is comprised of landmarks, prominent St. Louis companies, restaurants, law firms, civic buildings, individuals, markets, banks, hospitals, churches, etc. … many of which seem to have no relation or relevance to the original shooting incident.

The result of the grand jury investigation is expected to be announced sometime soon and this list is obviously meant to concentrate the efforts of the expected “demonstrators” on targets of disrespect and opportunity. And why this list is not an incitement to an insurrection is beyond my limited legal understanding … even though such a purpose is cagily denied. But if and when such locations are trashed or looted or even worse if the grand jury decision in police officer Darren Wilson’s case is not of these rebels liking, I would imaging that this social-media listing comprises a major tort … and should be dealt within the justice system just as this system should deal with Officer Wilson’s possible indictment and trial.

Of course, race or political persuasion seems to be the determining factor driving opinions in this case and, although we, the public, do not have the benefit of all the grand jury testimony, from what I have read, I personally believe Officer Wilson was partly justified in doing what he did. But I do think he will be indicted for at least involuntary manslaughter. The most damaging factors in this whole sorry incident was that the "gentle giant" Michael Brown was shot six times and was left lying in the street for at least four hours before his body was recovered. These assumed facts clearly have caused most of the unrest in the population of this St. Louis suburb … and will be the reasons I expect that Officer Wilson will eventually face a jury of his peers.

However, an insurrections solves nothing as was learned in the Los Angeles “Rodney King” riots of 1965. I do hope that this very dangerous circumstance is avoided or thwarted. But I'm not holding my breath.