Monday, August 16, 2021

News Flash



Biden has phoned Trump this morning and apologized for stealing the presidency … and asked him if he wanted it back?


STAND UP FOR MAGA!


12 comments:

DEN said...

I'm thinking of boycotting anyone who still refuses to admit that Biden won fair and square, unless they can provide indisputable evidence that Trump won.

Not allegations, not innuendo, not suspicions. Proof. Release the Kraken. Put up or shut up!

George W. Potts said...

One’s world gets smaller and smaller as one scornfully “assails the years.”
I think it’s now called personcott? Proof is obviously in the eyes of the beholder … or those willing to behold.
BYW, how come algorithms work for our Big Tech censors?

ChillFin said...

Actual vote counts are not algorithms, suspicions, or "estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends."

George W. Potts said...

I think that the algorithm used is the following: “ https://www.democraticaudit.com/2019/03/01/detecting-election-fraud-is-it-possible-to-identify-manipulated-vote-counts%EF%BB%BF/”
Does this suggest a tinfoil-hat type stuff?

ChillFin said...

What a crock! Maybe that is appropriate for catching card counters and loaded dice but using the patterns of the last digit in reported counts is only marginally more absurd than estimates based on trends.

George W. Potts said...

Where did you get your math degree? This is a well-respected method of detecting numbers fraud.

ChillFin said...

That's not math. It is statistics and probability. Why not the second-to-last digit? Why not whether they are prime numbers? Why not whether they have two or more sequential digits? My degree was in accounting and auditing.

George W. Potts said...

Statistics : a branch of mathematics dealing with the collection, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of masses of numerical data

George W. Potts said...

Benford’s Law, also known as the Law of First Digits or the Phenomenon of Significant Digits, is the finding that the first digits (or numerals to be exact) of the numbers found in series of records of the most varied sources do not display a uniform distribution, but rather are arranged in such a way that the digit “1” is the most frequent, followed by “2”, “3”, and so in a successively decreasing manner down to “9”

ChillFin said...

Gee, that’ll sway the Supreme Court. We are talking about an election, not whether consumers buy more shaving cream for cents-off or percent-discount.

George W. Potts said...

This law determines whether a collection of statistics, like election results, are naturally random … or manufactured. Simple?
Stuffing ballot results is a manufactured process. Be patient grasshopper, everything will eventually come out.

ChillFin said...

You mean that Al Gore DID win in 2000?