Friday, February 19, 2016

Apple vs. the FBI


Apple's dilettante CEO, Tim Cook, to me, is grandstanding about not giving the FBI access to the terrorist Syed Farook's IPhone ... see: ABC News Story. Already the FBI has a court order and, the way I read it, it doesn't want to compromise Apple's security mechanism on this or any other of its devices. This is not magic. I have a little experience in this area. Apple knows exactly how and where the access code is stored in this IPhone's memory ... which is the property of San Bernardino County anyway. All Apple would have to do is to recover this access code ... without revealing its process ... and provide it to San Bernardino County which then would provide it to the FBI.

Problem solved ... and, possibly, a few more terrorists might be caught ... and Tim Cook would have grown a few inches taller in the eyes of the American public. And in the future, this court-order process might be repeated whenever there is a sufficient and compelling need for such access into IPhones. I'm sure that the government might even be willing to pay Apple for their efforts.

Yes, I also realize that Apple might not sell quite as many IPhones to criminals and terrorists ... small price to pay.

Afterward: See how Apple treats digital privacy issues in China: Breitbart Article.

2 comments:

ChillFin said...

San Bernardino County screwed up the iPhone the FBI wants Apple to fix: http://mashable.com/2016/02/19/apple-fbi-san-bernadino-iphone/#.NNHZMdQBPq3 , yet still it seems doable http://mashable.com/2016/02/17/how-apple-could-hack-iphone/#DcciXz0psZqF if it was not automatically wiped clean.

George W. Potts said...

So the FBI screwed the pooch by allowing San Berardino County to have the IPhone to begin with? I still believe that Tim Cook is acting like Fred Grandstand ...