Showing posts with label malaria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label malaria. Show all posts

Friday, April 24, 2020

Red Cells


No, this blog entry is not about the fellow-traveler groups (red cells) that Bernie Sanders was likely befriending throughout his “Democratic Socialist” life ... it is about hemoglobin ... the red blood cells that carry oxygen in our blood. The thinking is evolving that COVID-19 is starving our bodies of oxygen not so much by what it does to our lungs ... but what it does to our blood. Maybe this is why ventilators have such poor recovery results?

A close friend of my son is a radiologist in Maine ... and he told my son that this new coronavirus theory is circulating in the medical community. And that is that this virus is somehow affecting our red blood cell’s ability to carry oxygen throughout our bodies ... and that is why many so afflicted walk into Emergency Rooms with oxygen levels in their blood as low as 70 ... whereas anything below 93 is considered medically serious.

Now, here is were I, like Trump, get medically loopy. But, nevertheless, some of the following connections are intriguing.

Many blacks in Africa suffer from sickle-cell anemia (less so in the U.S.) ... where their red blood cells are deformed ... which is good and bad. It is bad in that these red cells carry less oxygen ... but it is good in that it helps them combat malaria. Now the malaria parasite does affect red blood cells in their functioning. If COVID-19 does also in a similar way, is this why the anti-malaria drug, hydroxychloquine may be helpful under certain circumstances?

It is easy to condemn such unstudied speculations ... but it often is such out-of-the-box thinking that presages breakthroughs. Let’s keep our dialog and minds open, OK?

Sunday, March 22, 2020

Headlines


Cuomo escalates safety mandates, orders all ‘non-essential’New Yorkers to stay home

Coronavirus live update: Unprecedented stop in economic activity, Americans worry about looming bills

UK SHUT ...

Spring breakers party on beaches, despite social distancing

Indiana becomes seventh state postpone presidential primary

Junk bond default rate to triple within 12 months S&P says

Fed begins pumping municipal bonds ...

‘Stunning’ correlation: Coronavirus not spreading in malaria countries

U.S.-Mexico to partially close border

IRS extends tax filing deadline until July 15th as coronavirs spreads, Mnuchin says

Delta, United sending largest planes to desert for storage ...

Lobby insists abortions must continue during coronavirus crisis

Saturday, July 01, 2017

Mosquito Cost


Bill Gates believes that a pandemic caused by a mosquito-borne illness is a greater threat than global warfare ... see: Daily Mail Article. Perhaps so. Now Bill Gates is either the richest man in the world or close to it with assets nearing $100 billion. So this pandemic threat offers his charitable instincts a perfect opportunity to go big.

Consider the following. Mosquitoes can be eliminated by first breeding them in captivity, sterilizing them with irradiation and then releasing them back into the wild to hook up to no end. Now, of course, this is not cheap. Let's assume that $10 million could fund such a program in a targeted locale ... and that one could identify a thousand such targets in the tropical and semi-tropical regions of the world. OK, maybe you would have to repeat things to eliminate the three sigma stragglers. So, for 20 billion dollars, Bill Gates could, if the environmentalists didn't rise up to object,  wipe out mosquitoes from the face of the Earth ... and, at the same time eliminate Zika, malaria, yellow fever and a host of other pestilences.

Wouldn't that be a memorable use of just a small portion of  the Gates fortune? He and Melinda might still have $80 billion left to live on or donate to things like the Clinton Foundation.