Showing posts with label document dump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label document dump. Show all posts

Monday, September 28, 2020

Headlines


Senate Dems ready tactics to muck up Supreme Court confirmation

Supreme Court to face major cases on Obamacare and religion

Former Trump economist: Biden tax plan would kill 3 million jobs

Sharpton: ‘I was glad’ Barrett’s children attended the ceremony ... ‘because I didn’t see too many people of color’ in audience’

North Korea accuses South Korea of illegally crossing boundary

U.S. has a ‘long way to go’ before herd immunity with less than 10% showing coronavirus antibodies

Tens of thousands attend Prayer March 2020 led by Franklin Graham

[Lindsey] Graham: Confirmation could get to the Senate floor ‘around’ October 26

Poland looks to toughen already stringent abortion laws

The September market swoon accomplished much of what market corrections are supposed to do

Latest Flynn document dump poses threat to Dems

Coney Barrett mentored first blind female Supreme Court clerk in U.S. history ...

STAND UP FOT AMERICA!

Saturday, October 11, 2014

Old News


There must be a half life to scandals … and so, the Clinton's just released, this past Friday night, a dump of many documents from the Clinton Library relating to their numerous sordid scandals … Whitewater, Monica Lewinsky, the pardoning of Mark Rich, Vince Foster, etc. … see: UK Telegraph Story and News10 Story. (The bigger the scandal, the longer must be the half-life ...) Many of these documents were heavily redacted and some were held back altogether. To use a tired old chestnut, this document dump was clearly and cynically meant to inoculate the Clinton's against further use of this information. In any future discussions they can, with a dismissive wave of the hand, offer the pusillanimous slight, “That’s old news!”

I find it very curious that good (or I might say evil) politicians seem to sense the exact timing of the aging process of scandalous stories in which they are involved. Thus, Hillary Clinton can put off any testimony about Benghazi until the American people (and the media) will dismiss any damaging revelations as “old news.” (Somehow Nixon never found the exact timing of this half-life process … although he surely tried.) I, on the other hand, react entirely the opposite way. Seeing politicians play this game of rope-a-dope just incites my outrage even more ... at this politician … and at the American people for allowing themselves to be so easily manipulated.

I guess I am forever cursed with my out-of-step mind.

And even more curious, after a sufficiently long delay (using some mysterious formula), the public may again have an appetite for the details of a particular scandal … the Sally Hemings, Thomas Jefferson affair comes to mind. How do I respond to such ancient revelations? My normal reaction is, “That’s old news!”