Parallel Evolution

I’m no biologist but it does seem obvious that animals did not evolve from plants ... nor mammals from reptiles. Most probably, life began on Earth not just in one spot at just one point in time ... a Garden of Eden so to speak. Rather, to me, there were likely millions of Edens over possibly millions of years which produced many multiple varieties of life ... many with some similarities ... many of which died out ... but many of which then evolved separately, ala Darwin, into the panoply of life we experience today.

Recent DNA studies combined with mathematical models suggest that all the animal and plant species that exist today, could not have evolved since the Earth cooled down using Darwin’s explanation alone. So perhaps my uneducated hypothesis, “parallel evolution,” may be one resolution  to this dilemma ... other than “intelligent design” that is. (This also suggest that the process of life’s creation is ... was? ... a lot more natural than previously thought.)

Perhaps?


STAND UP FOR AMERICA!

Heaslines

Giuliani: Mueller interview prep on Trump's summer schedule

Trump: I 'doubt' China trade negotiations will succeed

California resistance to Trump includes at least 32 lawsuits ...

Report: IG will declare FBI, DOJ broke law in Clinton e-mail probe

Trump: 'Animals' comment referred to MS-13 members

Warren Buffet: Interest rates are the 'most important' thing in determining stock values

RUDY: WE'LL RIP MUELLER APART

Trump donates first quarter salary to Department of. Veterans Affairs

Republicans are still running against Colin Kaepernick

Manafort's former son-in-law cuts plea deal with government

Chinese mass-indoctrination camps evoke cultural revolution ...

Pelosi defends MS-13

Artificial Invagination

We are obviously in a race to embrace any and all possible hook-ups as a tribute to our worship of diversity. You know the drill ... same sex, multiple partners, siblings, transgenders, children, animals ... and now robots are or should eventually be considered to be valid candidates for holy matrimony ... see: Slate Story. Here we are not talking about blow-up bed mates ... but full service A.I. spouses capable of all the Kama Sutra positions (reread this blog's title).

When this does eventually happen ... and I' m sure it will ... will all the complications of married life also follow ... divorces, spousal batteries, trial separations, child custody battles, etc.? Speaking of children, I can see robot husbands producing issue with female humans, but will female automaton spouses also be full-functioning reproductive partners?

At that point in time, I can imagine that  the only act that might be considered illegal and a crime against nature would be the marriage of two robots.