Showing posts with label Andy Warhol. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Andy Warhol. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 12, 2016

Yawn ...


Seven Andy Warhol screen prints of Campbell Soup cans purportedly worth $500,000 have been stolen from the Springfield, Missouri Art Museum ... see: NBC Story.

Yawn ...

Wait 50 years ... they won't be worth the $25,000 reward that the FBI is now offering for their return.

I know few may agree with me ... but I believe that Andy Warhol set back the fine art movement by at least a generation.

Monday, February 23, 2015

Grunge

Leslie and Leigh Keno
The Keno brothers (you know, the twin twits on The Antique Roadshow) have helped propagated the notion that grunge is good. If a beautiful Philidelphia Chippendale chair has been refinished or had its tattered seat cover replaced, it's value plummets by 90%. As long as there is no restoration on an antique of any type, according to these taste setters, it is far more valuable. Why? That's just the way it is ... because these guardians of public taste say so ... and the fact that collector lemmings follow such pronouncements at auctions and estate sales, reinforces such nonsense. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of dollars ... or even millions of dollars of profit in the fine art world ... has a contra-logical way of influencing people's taste. Of couse, fifty years from now things could well be reversed. Following fads is a dangerous way of long-term investing.

Witness how expensive a Renoir or Andy Warhol paintings are today ...

(By the bye ... the same twisted logic can be applied to who or what wins awards ... like at the Oscars.)

Afterward: There is a certain irony in following the advice of these taste-arbiter twins ... by the name of Keno ... in that you are really taking a gamble.

Friday, May 17, 2013

Art Bubble

Jackson Pollock's "Number 19, 1948"

Art is a vanity business.  “Oh, is that a Jackson Pollock?” … hung on a wall of a Palm Beach ocean-front mansion that was bought for less than the price of the painting. “Why, yes it is … I just had to have what is considered the best example of his ‘drip and splash’ period.”   Notice I didn’t say “fine art” because most of that has disappeared into museums and the basement vaults of art thieves.  I said “art” as exemplified by the likes of Andy Warhol … whom I consider that single person who managed to remove the adjective “fine” from the art world’s vernacular.

And to present a glaring example of such daub-struck schlock … which is now considered exemplary, please take a gander at what some doofus paid $1.9 million for recently:  Bea Arthur Naked.  It doesn't even look like her ... and should be painted on black velvet.

Christie’s just set the art-auction record in New York at $495 million of mostly contemporary paintings … see: Financial Times Article.  And why does such a mania exist?  You can thank our Federal Reserve Chairman, Ben Bernanke, who is causing the printing presses at the nation’s mint to melt from overuse … flooding the world’s plutocrats with more money than brains.  First the affluent bought gold.  Then when that bubble bust, they started buying stocks. Now that this market looks frothy, many have switched to paintings.

And Lawrence Welk never had as many bubbles as are now emanating out of New York City’s art galleries and auction houses.

Afterward:  It's been revealed that Jimmy Kimmel was the $1.9 million purchaser of the Bea Arthur painting ... see: Breitbart Story

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Language Police



Andy Warhol’s famous “everyone gets 15 minutes of fame” observation apparently was quite prophetic.  Current examples of those seeking such transient notoriety are sexting, goofy YouTube videos, Facebook, reddit posts, or even those ego maniacs who feel that their blog postings are golden prose.  But there is another type of grandstander who seeks headlines by bowdlerizing our everyday communications … the language police if you will.  The latest Warhol-type is a woman in Cranston, RI who has a child suffering from dwarfism.  She went berserk when she saw the word “midget” on a pickle jar and coerced the pickle company into changing their labeling … see: CBS News Story.

There are many other examples of such linguist political correctness -- Native American, visually impaired, African American, Happy Holiday, firefighter, vertically challenged, freedom fries, etc. … see: Political Correctness and, for a more extensive treatment, see: Language Police

Perhaps the Cains pickle company might have changed their pickle-jar packaging to read “Kosher Dill Little People”?



Monday, October 25, 2010

Hall of Lame

















The 20th Century has had a number of personalities whose fame far exceeded their ability. Can we say that their grasp exceeded their reach? Here, in my opinion, are a fair number of them:

Architecture – Frank Lloyd Wright
Art – Andy Warhol (honorable mention, Salvador Dali)
Business – Bill Gates
Dance – Martha Graham
TV – Walter Cronkite
Movies – Mae West (honorable mention, Joan Crawford)
Music – Bob Dylan (honorable mention, Madonna)
Poetry – Maya Angelou
President – Woodrow Wilson (honorable mention, Jimmy Carter)
Royalty – Princess Diana (honorable mention, Prince Charles)
Science – Carl Sagan (honorable mention, Al Gore)
Sports – Wilt Chamberlain
Stage – Ethel Merman (honorable mention, Carol Channing)
Writing – Norman Mailer

If anyone wants my rationale(s) for these pick(s), leave a challanging comment and I will respond.

Friday, December 08, 2006

TRADITIONAL TRADITIONS

“In olden days a glimpse of stocking was looked on as something shocking, now heavens knows, anything goes.” (Cole Porter)

Recently I wrote a blog on another site (Dartmouth Traditions) about college traditions, their plusses and minuses. This has caused me in turn to think about much of today’s social and political conflicts in these same terms – the push and pull between modernity and traditions. To be specific:

Gay Marriage – a main argument against gay marriage is that it changes the definition of “traditional” marriage (one man, one woman). Therefore, the “modern” view is pro gay marriage. However, I find it most ironic that gay couples often wrap themselves in the age-old marital traditions (a walk down the aisle, a wedding cake, exchanging rings, etc.). This has just a touch of pathos to it.

Radical Islam – it seems that much of bin Laden’s hatred of the West has to do with the creeping modernity with which we seem to have infected the world. Sex, drugs and rock-and-roll would clearly vanish under traditional Sharia rule (the ultimate world goal for Al Qaeda). Women (and I suspect many minorities) would lose centuries of emancipation. And whole populations would resemble Afghanistan ere its recent liberation: one-eye burkas (see BeliefNet), brutal stoning-to-death executions, destruction of centuries old art works, etc. “Civilizations” would clearly become a lot less civil.

Journalism – Ernie Pyle exemplified journalism in the Second World War. David Gregory exemplifies it today. There is a rift between these two styles of reporting as wide as the seas. Is the traditional journalism mold better than the “modern” one? I’ll let you be the judge.

Rap Music – Does anyone really think that out-year reunions of today’s youth will nostalgically involve Gangsta Rap? Modernity is not always indisputably better.

Old Europe – Without traditional garb, food, architecture, etc. Rick Steves would have to find another line of business. The charm of traveling through France, Germany, Spain, etc. is experiencing these delights first hand. Usually, however such vacations do not include a sampling of the local politics … which is far from traditional.

Art Movements – Impressionism, Cubism, Abstract Impressionism, Pop Art, Op Art, etc. Art movements come in quick succession like waves sucking on a money-strewn beach. Which of these movements are “traditional”? Time alone can make this ultimate judgment. But please give me just one opinion … Andy Warhol has done more to trash the progress of art in the twentieth century than the Taliban ever could have.

The lesson here is that everything old is not necessarily good and everything new isn’t necessarily bad. However, once a tradition is establishes, it has an inertia that should not be fooled with carelessly. But changing circumstances can devalue a tradition as well as make a good innovation poisonous. It is only mindless insistence on a style of behavior that seems truly dangerous.