If, dear reader, there is anymore concrete proof that anti-Trumpers are compliant sheep, look no further than how they (you?) are reacting to the General Flynn exoneration from his conviction of lying to the FBI.
Typical Liberal: Baa, baa, baa ... AG Barr is a partisan ... covering for Trump!
Me: Have you read any ... or even about any ... of the documents that are the predicates for this Flynn exoneration?
Typical Liberal: Baa, baa, baa ... no I don’t need to. I have heard what Comey and Schiff have said in response to this legal travesty! These public servants are obviously innocent of any collusion ... and didn’t Flynn plead guilty! Enough for me ... baa, baa, baa.
Curious? Read: The Federalist Article and Breitbart Article
6 comments:
...or is it the Lemming calling the Owl 50 shades of gray?
Is Barr not partisan? (Why would anyone think that?)
Did Flynn not plead guilty? (Ooh, he was intimidated like a schoolgirl)
Did Flynn have contacts with Russians and Turks? (Yeas, but...)
Did Trump fire Flynn for lying to Pence?
Yeah, we're the sheep pulling the wool over our own eyes. You nailed it.
Did I make my case?
Very interesting, as is the WSJ piece by Kimberly Strassel today. I’d be interested in your reaction/analysis to today's NYTimes editorial with the neutral headline “Don’t Forget, He Pleaded Guilty Twice. Twice."
Flynn spent himself into penury ($4M) to have a law firm “defend” him ... of which Eric Holder is a partner. They led him down the primrose path as part of this cabal. It wasn’t till he got this new pit bull lawyer (I forget her name) that he is getting a semblance of justice through discovery. I haven’t read either article ... but I would trust Strassel and not the Grey Lady.
Luckily its up to a judge not the Tiger King in the attorney general's office who will determine his fate. And don't forget once the numb nuts are out of office, charges can be renewed. Oh, I thought you read both sides of the argument.
Tiger Lily,
I’ll bet you cheered for Pol Pot ...
Post a Comment