Showing posts with label trade wars. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trade wars. Show all posts

Friday, March 08, 2019

The Path Forward


It is becoming increasingly obvious that we are stuck in an ultra-low interest rate environment and into the foreseeable future. Central banks around the world are keeping rates very low ... even in negative territory ... to keep stimulating their economic growth and foreign trade. This almost universal strategy has forced the American Federal Reserve Bank to stop interest rate hikes ... and its monetary tightening by reducing its balance sheet.

The consequences of this development suggests three things:

1) The United States is losing its ability to lead world-wide economic policy. We started to ‘normalize’ interest rates and, when the rest of the world did not follow suit, we backed off. We thought we were the monetary pied piper ... but we have learned that this is not the case.

2) Being that interest rates should remain so very low, this means that world-wide debt will grow beyond reasonable bounds. This suggests that a debt crisis is baked into our future. And it also suggests that funds holders ... like banks and senior citizens ... will not be advantaged like in past business cycles.

3) When the next economic turndown does occur, the Fed has little or no room to play the dove. If interest rates are still essentially zero, there is not a lot of room to go lower ... even if they are taken into negative territory. And, if the Fed’s balance sheet is still so bloated, there is not a lot of room to inject more money into the economy.

Yes, the current tariff wars complicate these monetary decisions enormously. But, one hopes that today’s lopsided trade balances resolve themselves before the next recession hits ... or the next debt crisis rears it’s ugly head.

I’m holding my breath ...

Wednesday, July 11, 2018

Headlines


Congress should stop meeting with Rod Rosenstein

Amazon is charging more for sellers to promote big discounts on Prime Day

Syrian state media says air defenses hit Israeli plane, thwart missile strike ...

Jimmy Carter: Jesus would 'approve' of gay marriage, abortions

Trump's trade war was decades in the making

With 36 governships up for grabs in midterms, Republicans have the most to lose

Paper: China's currency [yuan] depreciation should set off alarm bells ...

Mexico border life: Cartel gunmen attack 5 bars, kill 12

[PM] Theresa May appoints new Brexit Secretary

U.S. opposition to breastfeeding reportedly stuns world health officials

Boston weighs giving non-US citizens voting rights ...

Nissan admits rigging emission tests at Japanese plants

Saturday, March 03, 2018

Headlines


Trump blasted at home and abroad for plan to impose tariffs on steel, aluminum

NBC: MacMaster leaving the White House soon

Buchanan on China: We fed the tiger, created a monster ...

Trump: 'Trade wars are good and easy to win'

Trump's gun control embrace sets off scramble in Congress

Putin: Our new weapons 'easily' beat anti-missile systems -- but this is no Cold War

Paper: How can LA continue to function with 58K homeless?

2018 poll: Immigration, gun control top issues for voters ... Russian 'collusion' dead last

U.S. ambassador to Mexico stepping down

Europe lashes out against Trump's tariffs. EU will 'react firmly' ... to defend our interests

Trump's judicial nominee confirmed despite Schumer's complaint that he's white ...

Trump, Pence meet with NRA in Oval Office amid growing differences

Friday, October 07, 2011

Yuan for the Money, Two for the Show ...


The conventional thinking is that free trade is good and protectionism, through higher imposed tariffs, is bad.  It was the Smoot-Hawley protectionist-trade bill that is thought to have contributed the Great Depression in 1930 as trade wars then became the order of the day and economic growth slowed around the world (see: The Economist Article).
 
Now the United States is contemplating imposing tariffs on certain Chinese goods in retaliation for China not allowing its currency, the yuan, to float (allowing world currency markets to determine its value as opposed to China itself pegging an artificially low yuan-to-dollar rate.)  It is thought that China keeps its currency at 20-30% below fair market value in order to subsidize its exports and discourage imports.  In other words, such manipulation amounts to a virtual tariff and many politicians in the United States now believe that it is time to bring things back into balance with selective U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods.  A bipartisan Senate bill that so does should be voted on today ... see: Expected Senate Vote.  China has threatened to retaliate (see: China's Threat) and this has caused some politicians, particularly John Boehner in the House, to speak out against taking such an protectionist action.  President Obama is noticeably absent in this kerfuffle (see: Wall Street Journal Article) since staking a claim on either side doesn't seem to help his reelection chances.

Whatever the results of this action against China in the U.S. Congress may be (my prediction, it will eventually pass), I believe that China's bark will be worse than its bite.  One has to only look at the recent trade numbers (see:  Trade Balances with China) to see that, if a full-fledged trade war does break out, China would be far worse off than the United States in terms of its balance of payments.  Yes, U.S. domestic economic activity may turn down in the short term, but, longer-term, there should be much benefit to be gained for U.S. industries.  However, since the United States is the major buyer of China-made goods, an industrial production  turn-down there would likely cause great social unrest ... a situation that Chinese leadership might find difficult to damp down.  Already, there are predictions of such Chinese economic dislocations independent of protectionism actions on the part of the U.S. Congress ... see CNBC Comments.

Possible investment consequences might well be: a further deflation in world-wide commodity prices, an inflation in consumer goods prices in the U.S., and an increase in interest rates on U.S. government securities (if China starts dumping its holdings).  Also, holding onto the stocks of Walmart, Best Buy, etc. might not be a great idea.