Showing posts with label defendant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label defendant. Show all posts

Thursday, November 14, 2019

Exculpatory Evidence


Exculpatory evidence is evidence that tends to show the innocence of the accused.

If someone is on trial and the prosecution withholds exculpatory evidence from defense lawyers, then the defendant is (or should be) found not guilty by reason of prosecutorial misconduct.

Is Adam Schiff not withholding exculpatory evidence in his Impeachment Inquiry hearings? Like the name of the whistleblower?


Friday, October 12, 2012

Legal Eagle


Massachusetts Senate candidate, Elizabeth Warren, has a very unique riposte to Senator Scott Brown's charge about just how little she stands up for the common man.  She now says that, even though she was a lawyer (or perhaps a legal consultant?) for The Travelers Insurance when it was a defendant in a class-action lawsuit by a plaintiff group of asbestos victims, "[s]he pointed out that that plaintiffs’ lawyers in the case and asbestos workers’ unions have said her advocacy in the case helped protect the settlement for victims" (see: boston.com Story).

Perhaps it is true that, even though Elizabeth Warren was contracted to help the defendant, The Travelers, and took a hefty fee for this legal effort, she was "secretly" working for the plaintiffs.  How can this be?  Either she is misrepresenting what she did in this case ... or she violated her legal ethical standards when she tilted toward the plaintiffs when representing and taking money from the defendant.  This is clearly a major conflict of interests ... and should cause a further look by the Harvard Law School and/or the Massachusetts Bar Association.  Ha Ha!!