Game Changer

Let us draw a few presidential contrasts:

Clinton,  Bush. and Obama did not try to address the North Korean nuclear threat ... Trump appears to be making some progress

Clinton,  Bush. and Obama did not effectively push back against the NATO payment slackers ... Trump has

Obama did nothing when Russia invaded the Ukraine ... Trump has armed them to resist

Clinton,  Bush. and Obama had ineffective and expensive Middle East strategies ... Trump appears to reversed both stumbles

Clinton, Bush and Obama had ignored Russian violations of the cruise missile treaty ... Trump hasn’t

Obama, with the Federal Reserve Bank’s help, was happy with GDP growth below 2% ... Trump has taken it above 3% even with the Fed working against him

Clinton, Bush and Obama had ignored the growing Venezuelan disaster, Trump hasn’t

Clinton, Bush. and especially Obama did not  address the Iranian threats ... Trump appears to have put Iran’s mullahs back in a box

Obama did not resist the Russian pipeline into Germany ... Trump has

Clinton, Bush and Obama had ineffective immigration policies and enforcement ... Trump is trying to fix things, resisted by Democrats and much of corporate America

Clinton and Obama were clearly anti-Israel ... Trump is just the opposite

ISIS was created due to Obama’s ineptitude and he would not defeat them ... Trump has

... Is this enough evidence that Trump is a game changer?

Machismo

I hate to believe that the Obummer administration would make military and cyber-warfare decisions based upon the political climate of the current presidential race. Can we weigh the following unusual events to see if they may be designed to aid one side in this contest?

- The planned final assault on what's left of the ISIS forces in Mosul, Iraq. After months of run-up and the insertion of hundreds more of US military "advisers", this assault is taking place against any Islamic States forces that have been foolish enough to stay in Mosul ... see: Activist Post Story. After years of a namby-pamby foreign policy, I find it deeply offensive that this administration would cynically time and sacrifice possible American or even Iraqi lives in order to get Hellary Clinton elected.

- The CIA's telegraphed cyber-attack on Russia ... probably to accent the Democrats' charge that Russia has been the source of the embarrassing Wikileaks e-mail hacks over the last many months ... see: NBC News Story. Note the funny wording in this story "a possible 'covert' cyber attack"! How can it be covert if it is in the national news?

- The recent cruise missile attacks on three radar sites inside of Houthi-controlled Yemen perpetuates the narrative that Obummer is not beholden to Iran ... see: The Guargian Story. This is because the Houthis are sponsored and funded by Iran ... probably with some ot the $150 billion gift from the Obummer administration ... connected to the highly-unpopular Iran nuclear agreement.

I find it just a little ironic that the Democrats are attempting to elect our first female president predicated on using machismo tactics.