Russians Hacked White House

Apparently Russian hackers broke into the White House computer systems through a breach in the State Department's cyber-security systems ... see: CNN Revelation. To me this is an exciting development. Perhaps these Ruskies can now reveal to us Americans where Obama was born and what his college records contain?

(Could this reference to the "State Department" be, in fact, Hillary Clinton's private e-mail server?)

Where Angels Fear to Tread

I have been warned by a friend to not pursue Obama’s possible Social Security number purloining mentioned in my previous blog entry.  And there are too two other discordant Obama anomalies that have been deemed taboo by the popular narrative … Obama’s actual birthplace and his missing college records (applications, grade transcripts, etc.). Like a moth drawn to a flame, your blogster’s curiosity is peeked by these no-nos … and recent revelations make it even more difficult to follow the crowd in eschewing these mysteries. Maybe if it were just the birth certificate kafuffle, I would leave it alone. But the fact that Obama’s Chicago legal team has spent millions of dollars to block access to this info, arouses my radical-right tropisms. Here are the references to these recent Obama revelations … along with a few of my observations:

1) Social Security number – See: SS Number Challenge. This woman seems to know her stuff … and has carefully documented her misgivings about Obama’s possible Social Security number malfeasance.

2) Birthplace – See: American Thinker and LA Times Story. Yes, Sheriff Joe does have a bone to pick with the Obama administration … just like they with him. However, why did it take over three years for this “document” to be released? And if Obama’s long-form birth certificate is indeed a forgery, won’t it go down in the annals of history as a major sullying of the U.S. Constitution?

3) College records – See: The Blaze.  (If, in fact, these college records still exist.) Again, this fellow obviously has it in for Obama, but why haven’t we seen a slew of thoughtful rebuttals to his recent allegations?

I will leave it to you Obama’s supporters to “snopes” the disproofs to these suppositions. Personally, I have found Snopes, once a fair-minded fact checker, increasingly to seem to be an arm of the Democrat National Committee. And since Harry Reid has established the template that, to clear up his charges that Romney paid no taxes for ten years … Romney must comply with Reid's disclosure demand, can’t the opposition also claim that Obama can solve the above enigmas by letting in the cleansing sunlight of complete disclosure?

I fully expect brickbats to follow … but then I’m no angel.

Drumbeat

The majority of media in this country have taken up the Democrat drumbeat to get Mitt Romney to release more than two years of his federal tax returns.  Since the Democrats run the IRS, I would imagine that there is good reason to do so (even though such snooping shenanigans are illegal.) They must know that there is something in there to embarrass Romney otherwise why the continued rat-a-tat?

I don't remember the same insistence in 2008 for releasing Obama's college records, or the explanation for his bizarre Social Security number (see: SS# Issue), or numerous other potential embarrassments in The Barry's past (isn't snorting cocaine a felony?)  But then pointing out such uneven treatment in the U.S. media is, in itself, old news.

Should Romney release more tax returns?  I think he probably should ... but only and not until Obama comes clean himself on his own numerous hidden skeletons.