Sydney Powell Again

General Flynn

Some dramatic new evidence has been revealed in the General Flynn case ... see: Conservative Treehouse video. Why has it taken so long for this dirt to be given up by the FBI? This delay is almost as damning as the original Obamagate crimes. Sydney Powell is an attorney par excellence. Judge Sullivan has shown himself to be a babinzo.


STAND UP FOR AMERICA!

En Banc

On Tuesday, the ten member D.C. District Court reheard, en banc (as a whole), the appeal of Judge Sullivan’s refusal to dismiss General Flynn’s case after the DOJ had removed itself from prosecuting this case ... and after this court’s three judge panel had directed Sullivan to do so ... see: Courthouse News.

The interesting development during this hearing is located in paragraph 12 of the above hyperlink where it is revealed that one motivation of AG Barr’s rationale for withdrawing from this case is evidence discovered in Durham’s investigation of the events surrounding what is now known as Obamagate.

What this evidence is was not disclosed ... interesting! Could this be the very same evidence that President Trump said last week was “breathtaking?” I would love to speculate about what this evidence may be ... but I will leave this tasty morsel to you, kind reader.

STAND UP FOR AMERICA!

Cross Examination

The judge in the General Michael Flynn case, Emmett Sullivan, has gone to extraordinary lengths not to let this case die ... as the Justice Department and the DC District Court have decreed ... see the following for the very unusual steps he has taken: FoxNews Story. Judge Sullivan has even, early-on in this case, called General Flynn a “traitor” in open court ... for which he later apologized ... but in which he still must believe ... else why his recent malign behavior?

Somehow, I strongly suspect Judge Sullivan has learned, maybe from Flynn’s original attorneys, Covington, a piece of extraordinarily damaging “information” about the general ... and firmly believes it ... possibly the same fact or facts  behind what President Obama warned Trump about Flynn ... and, the details of which, have been denied to Trump, Flynn’s current attorney, Sidney Powell or the DC Circuit Court.

Whatever this sub rosa indictment of Flynn might be, it needs to be brought out into the open so that we all can gauge Flynn’s innocence or guilt ... and not rely on the prejudice of a single judge who is sworn to be above such rumored pettiness.

My suspicion — this “heinous act” by Flynn has not been revealed because it would not stand cross examination. This is not the way justice is supposed to work. The Constitution says we all have the “right to confront our accuser.”

See also: Conservative Treehouse Post.