Governor Chris Christie is an enigma to me. He probably is as thuggish as President Obama or the Clinton's … he is from New Jersey after all. As an
example, I do suspect he purposely zinged Mitt Romney right before the last
presidential election with his bear hug of Obama … possibly as retribution for not being
picked as Mitt's Vice Presidential running mate. And this had a lot to do with
Romney losing the election. I also think that he is more involved in the bridge-gate
dust-up than he lets on. And moreover
I believe that, when he was being vetted him for the Vice Presidential slot, Romney’s people
found more skeletons in Christie’s closet.
These are bound to eventually come out.
But then again, the man thinks mostly good conservative
thoughts and communicates these thoughts well.
He recently spoke to an Economic Club of Chicago gathering in which he convincingly
debunked the recent Democrats’ gnashing of teeth over "income inequality." Quoting from the New York Times he said:
The problem is that Americans do not want income equality, suggesting that it is antithetical to the country’s abiding belief in “income opportunity” that rewards hard work and merit. “You want income equality? That is mediocrity,” he said. “Everybody can have an equal, mediocre salary.”
You can see the previous quote in the following Times
article, but you need to slog through a number of brickbats first … see: NY Times Article. (Funny how quickly the Times turned on
Christie once Hillary was the presumptive Democrat nominee in 2016.) I did see Christie deliver these ideas on television
and he was quite convincing … dead on … something that the far left needs to
worry about if they are going to continue flexing their Socialist muscles over
this issue.
There will be a lot of back and forth with this Christie fellow over the next three years. I don’t think
he has a chance of being President … but, if he wanted to, he could serve an
enormously useful function in the upcoming election. He could be the Republicans’ junk-yard dog …
popping all of the left’s pomposities as they raise their poll-tested syrupy
heads … kind-of like the James Carville of the right. Then maybe, if the Republicans can regain the
White House, he might be rewarded with some useful administrative post … say
Chief of Staff or Congressional Liaison?
He, like he has done in New Jersey, could help fix things.
He, like he has done in New Jersey, could help fix things.
2 comments:
I agree that most Americans (including Democrats) prefer "income opportunity" to "income equality". The latter idea resonates best with those who are at the bottom of the economic heap - many of whom are working hard, yet struggling economically. History has shown that the masses need a scapegoat to blame for their misfortunes. Filthy Rich Guys provide a perfect target for arrows of blame.
And, it is easy to believe that they are probably guilty of some crime.
Otherwise known as "Democrat voters."
Post a Comment