Senator Ron Johnson has pointed out that the Pfizer vaccine that the FDA approved for full use IS NOT the vaccine that is being used in the United States … see: Conservative Treehouse posting.
Did our top scientists pull a bait and switch in order to get more unvaccinated people to get the shot? Was Sen. Johnson wrong? Its either the same vaccine or it isn’t. Someone is lying. All I know is 2 people on the Advisory Panel voted against full approval. And the Pfizer stock is off big time in the last few weeks. I anxiously await the truth.
And:
I also went to look at Pfizer’s press release (bold italics underline mine) here:
“ On August 23, 2021, the FDA approved the first COVID-19 vaccine. The vaccine has been known as the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty, for the prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.The vaccine also continues to be available under emergency use authorization (EUA), including for individuals 12 years of age and older, for the administration of a third dose in certain immunocompromised people, and for a single booster dose in people:”
Hmm!? Do we prefer the wool over our eyes?
Afterward: See: John Hinderaker’s take. When combining these numbers with those of the vaccine risks themselves, is beginning to make the payback of getting vaccinated or boosted a push … particularly for younger people.
STAND UP FOR FDA HONESTY!
4 comments:
You and Sen Johnson really need to learn to read plain English. The statement clearly refers to Full use approval for "Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, and will now be marketed as Comirnaty." No distinction between vaccine other than the marketing name.
The second part simply sates that the booster and 12+ is still EUA not yet approved for full use. You should stand up for honesty, not conspiracy.
I stand by the word “also” means that there are two forms of the Pfizer vaccine … one approved and one “emergency use.” And the latter is what is being used for boosters and new vaccinations here in the U.S. since we are sheeple.
$20 says its the same vaccine for all three shots, different usage approvals. And zero evidence that there is any difference in the US and non-US. Stand up for Parsing words honestly!
Pfizer says that they are the same vaccines but are “legally distinct” … see: https://heavy.com/news/comirnaty-vs-pfizer-vaccine-legally-distinct. But somehow it doesn’t deem to tell us what this legal distinction means? This is not just splitting hairs … it is splitting semantics. Why didn’t the FDA fully authorize the old vaccine if it is the same? I would ignore this if the FDA had been straight with us all along … but they weren’t.
Post a Comment