Pilgrim, imagine you are a juror in a likely upcoming Trump trial in south Florida over his having secret government documents and obstruction of justice.
You are told by the Trump defense that the Presidential Records Act gave Trump 5 years to decide what documents he wanted to keep and which he turned over to the archives. This presidential prerogative was superseded by a hostile partisan DOJ and Trump disagreement wherein Trump still wanted to keep some historic momentous.
Contrast this with Biden’s clearly illegal retention of many times this amount of government documentation. And ditto Hillary Clinton’s illegally storing many time this number on an unsecured server which had been breached by our adversaries … and then, after being warned to retain this evidence, destroyed it on the server and on multiple cell phones.
At this point you would be reminded by the defense that none other than the former director of the FBI, James Comey, had very publicly said “no REASONABLE prosecutor would prosecute Hillary under these circumstances.” And clearly Joey Mumbles is skating on his illegal docs case.
Sooo … do these what-abouts constitute REASONABLE doubt in your mind? They do in mine.
STAND UP FOR REASONABLE DOIBT!
No comments:
Post a Comment