Obvious Truth: VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
So, what's your point in posting possible misinformation?
A further thought. I am not an anti-vaxer (I got the Pfizer jabs), nor do I understand the logic of the rabid vaxers insistence on punishing you if you are not vaccinated. The chances of dying are a whole lot higher if you haven’t been vaccinated. So, if you have the jab, you are a lot better off. …even with the CDC-stated possible risks. Those anti-vaxers (I never heard about the horse dewormer) know the risk they are taking. They are grownups … if they die, isn’t that their punishment? And, if the vaccinated can transmit the Wuhan-Fauci virus just as easily as the unvaccinated (as is claimed), then why do we vaccinated need to get so upset?
I also don’t understand insisting on those with antibodies must be vaccinated too?
This virus is going to be around for a very long time (the Spanish flu of 1918 hung on until 1950 … and yes they had a vaccine) … and eventually Australia and New Zealand will pay the price. Even China (I hope)!
I would definitely prefer that the CDC not publish unvetted claims. It is pretty clear that the majority of unvaccinated adults are misinformed about their chances of dying, and spreading the virus. The incidence of breakthough infections is pretty low So there is a vast difference in the potential for spread once a person is vaxed. STAND UP FOR CALMLY SPREADING THE TRUTH!
And you think that the other CDC data is validated? Seems some people draw a conclusion and then go back and construct their case …. something like CO2 (at 0.04%) is an “air pollutant” and out to fry us one and all?
More … the chance of dying for the unvaccinated is about 1% … higher if older, obese or immune compromised. Much lower … but bot zero if vaccinated. I don’t know what the breakthrough infection rate is. Perhaps that would be a good stat to add to their VAERS screen? (But I think it is higher than the quoted 5-10%.)
Ivermectin - Horse de-wormer is just what you need.
ReplyDeleteObvious Truth: VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness. The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. In large part, reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases. This creates specific limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.
ReplyDeleteSo, what's your point in posting possible misinformation?
Sniper,
ReplyDeleteThe same as the CDC’s point for publishing this data. Or would you prefer living under a rock? Or is that rhetorical?
A further thought. I am not an anti-vaxer (I got the Pfizer jabs), nor do I understand the logic of the rabid vaxers insistence on punishing you if you are not vaccinated. The chances of dying are a whole lot higher if you haven’t been vaccinated. So, if you have the jab, you are a lot better off. …even with the CDC-stated possible risks. Those anti-vaxers (I never heard about the horse dewormer) know the risk they are taking. They are grownups … if they die, isn’t that their punishment? And, if the vaccinated can transmit the Wuhan-Fauci virus just as easily as the unvaccinated (as is claimed), then why do we vaccinated need to get so upset?
ReplyDeleteI also don’t understand insisting on those with antibodies must be vaccinated too?
This virus is going to be around for a very long time (the Spanish flu of 1918 hung on until 1950 … and yes they had a vaccine) … and eventually Australia and New Zealand will pay the price. Even China (I hope)!
Calm down and think things through. Pilgrims.
I would definitely prefer that the CDC not publish unvetted claims.
ReplyDeleteIt is pretty clear that the majority of unvaccinated adults are misinformed about their chances of dying, and spreading the virus. The incidence of breakthough infections is pretty low So there is a vast difference in the potential for spread once a person is vaxed.
STAND UP FOR CALMLY SPREADING THE TRUTH!
And you think that the other CDC data is validated? Seems some people draw a conclusion and then go back and construct their case …. something like CO2 (at 0.04%) is an “air pollutant” and out to fry us one and all?
ReplyDeleteMore … the chance of dying for the unvaccinated is about 1% … higher if older, obese or immune compromised. Much lower … but bot zero if vaccinated. I don’t know what the breakthrough infection rate is. Perhaps that would be a good stat to add to their VAERS screen? (But I think it is higher than the quoted 5-10%.)
ReplyDelete