I'm thinking of boycotting anyone who still refuses to admit that Biden won fair and square, unless they can provide indisputable evidence that Trump won.
Not allegations, not innuendo, not suspicions. Proof. Release the Kraken. Put up or shut up!
One’s world gets smaller and smaller as one scornfully “assails the years.” I think it’s now called personcott? Proof is obviously in the eyes of the beholder … or those willing to behold. BYW, how come algorithms work for our Big Tech censors?
I think that the algorithm used is the following: “ https://www.democraticaudit.com/2019/03/01/detecting-election-fraud-is-it-possible-to-identify-manipulated-vote-counts%EF%BB%BF/” Does this suggest a tinfoil-hat type stuff?
What a crock! Maybe that is appropriate for catching card counters and loaded dice but using the patterns of the last digit in reported counts is only marginally more absurd than estimates based on trends.
That's not math. It is statistics and probability. Why not the second-to-last digit? Why not whether they are prime numbers? Why not whether they have two or more sequential digits? My degree was in accounting and auditing.
Benford’s Law, also known as the Law of First Digits or the Phenomenon of Significant Digits, is the finding that the first digits (or numerals to be exact) of the numbers found in series of records of the most varied sources do not display a uniform distribution, but rather are arranged in such a way that the digit “1” is the most frequent, followed by “2”, “3”, and so in a successively decreasing manner down to “9”
This law determines whether a collection of statistics, like election results, are naturally random … or manufactured. Simple? Stuffing ballot results is a manufactured process. Be patient grasshopper, everything will eventually come out.
I'm thinking of boycotting anyone who still refuses to admit that Biden won fair and square, unless they can provide indisputable evidence that Trump won.
ReplyDeleteNot allegations, not innuendo, not suspicions. Proof. Release the Kraken. Put up or shut up!
One’s world gets smaller and smaller as one scornfully “assails the years.”
ReplyDeleteI think it’s now called personcott? Proof is obviously in the eyes of the beholder … or those willing to behold.
BYW, how come algorithms work for our Big Tech censors?
Actual vote counts are not algorithms, suspicions, or "estimated numbers based on changing state dynamics and trends."
ReplyDeleteI think that the algorithm used is the following: “ https://www.democraticaudit.com/2019/03/01/detecting-election-fraud-is-it-possible-to-identify-manipulated-vote-counts%EF%BB%BF/”
ReplyDeleteDoes this suggest a tinfoil-hat type stuff?
What a crock! Maybe that is appropriate for catching card counters and loaded dice but using the patterns of the last digit in reported counts is only marginally more absurd than estimates based on trends.
ReplyDeleteWhere did you get your math degree? This is a well-respected method of detecting numbers fraud.
ReplyDeleteThat's not math. It is statistics and probability. Why not the second-to-last digit? Why not whether they are prime numbers? Why not whether they have two or more sequential digits? My degree was in accounting and auditing.
ReplyDeleteStatistics : a branch of mathematics dealing with the collection, analysis, interpretation, and presentation of masses of numerical data
ReplyDeleteBenford’s Law, also known as the Law of First Digits or the Phenomenon of Significant Digits, is the finding that the first digits (or numerals to be exact) of the numbers found in series of records of the most varied sources do not display a uniform distribution, but rather are arranged in such a way that the digit “1” is the most frequent, followed by “2”, “3”, and so in a successively decreasing manner down to “9”
ReplyDeleteGee, that’ll sway the Supreme Court. We are talking about an election, not whether consumers buy more shaving cream for cents-off or percent-discount.
ReplyDeleteThis law determines whether a collection of statistics, like election results, are naturally random … or manufactured. Simple?
ReplyDeleteStuffing ballot results is a manufactured process. Be patient grasshopper, everything will eventually come out.
You mean that Al Gore DID win in 2000?
ReplyDelete