Firing James Comey NO
Abuse of office NO
Russian collusion NO
Obstruction of justice NO
Porn star payoff NO
Campaign law violation NO
Emoluments clause violations NO
Quid pro quo NO
Bribery and extortion ?
Thursday, November 14, 2019
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Not Quite. There are a few days of juicy hearings ahead.
Abuse of Office is part of the inquiry
Obstruction of justice is not allowing those non-hearsay witnesses to testify.
Porn star payoff - not an impeachable crime, but he *did* pay her off. Red herring.
Quid pro Quo - too confusing for joe sixpack, but we all know what happened.
Extortion- guilty with a capital G.
Stay tuned ...
Post a Comment