There is a new and obviously effective way of soliciting charitable
donations … and that is for contributors to sign up for continued monthly
donations to philanthropic causes. Almost every night I see on television
sentimental and mawkish ads asking me to contribute to such causes as Wounded
Warriors, the ASPCA, UNICEF, the Shriners Hospital, etc. After mostly syrupy
appeals these ads then ask for $18 to $20 commitment per month to help save
disabled soldiers, abused puppies, and starving children. In exchange I would
receive a small blanket or a picture of a puppy or an African waif. Now I don’t fault these causes, in fact, I
generally agree with them and believe that they deserve the public’s support.
However, I do object to such noble causes stooping to such blatant mushiness in order to get their needed funds. I am certain that this type of
appeal must be super effective for the proliferation of such ads seems to be
skyrocketing. The monies raised must be phenomenal for these ads are not cheap
to produce and run so many times. Therefore I also suspect that much of the
money contributed goes not to the causes themselves, but to the solicitation
process. And, for the American public not to see that these ads are playing
them for suckers is really symptomatic of our penchant for putting our hearts
before our heads.
Please dear readers, if you want to contribute to such
foundations, send them a nice fat check … but don’t commit to a never-ending
draw on your bank accounts or credit cards. The latter shows your blind faith
in such causes which, in turn, may not keep true to their purposes over time …
particularly once the money starts rolling in so easily. In a way it might
become similar to our government’s irksome penchant for wasteful spending … given
its continued ability to reach into our pockets without recourse. Easy money can and often does corrupt even the noblest of causes.
So, if absolute power corrupts absolutely, easy money corrupts easily?
ReplyDeleteIndeed, indeed. Many believe that if we had to write a check every month to the IRS, our government would be a bit more humble Beardsley Ruml, understood this when he suggested that the automatic deduction of payroll taxes would mollify the American public ... and it certainly has done so. See "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beardsley_Ruml"
DeleteMy charitable giving policy is to investigate the outfit to find out how much of every donated dollar actually goes for the work/research/beneficiaries. If the administrative fees are more than 8 cents on the dollar, I pass. I never give to any solicitor for any reason whether at the door or on the phone . At Christmas I often tell the Salvation Army bell ringing Santas to stop that frigging annoying noise.
ReplyDelete