Monday, August 05, 2013
Hair on Fire
I know that I have gotten cynical in my dotage ... possibly too cynical ... but there is something manically weird about the United States's closing of 19 embassies in the Middle East and Africa ... see: CBS Story. Apparently our government has received credible and specific threats that there are massive Islamist attacks planned against one or more of our diplomatic facilities throughout the Muslim world. And so all these embassies will be shuttered until at least the end of this week. Numerous congress-persons have asserted that this terrorist chatter is even higher than it was before 9/11/2001 ... this time centered in Yemen.
The reasons I am somewhat cynical center around the following thoughts:
- This over-the-top drama certainly takes the media spotlight off of the many scandals that are plaguing the Obama administration. The embarrassing admission that al-Qaeda is capable of such a large-scale effort clearly refutes Obama's campaign assertion that al-Qaeda is on the run. Therefore, the downside of this policy reversal must, to them, be smaller than the risks emanating out of these numerous scandals.
- Will these supposed locked-and-loaded terrorists conclude that, since these embassies have be briefly closed, they will pack up and slink back to their hideouts ... foregoing any planned attacks? I sincerely doubt that timing is of the essence in any such planned assaults.
- If these supposed threats are "specific," why would we close all these embassies pell mell? Would we not have some reasonable idea about exactly where and when these attacks might take place?
- Since, thanks to Fast-Eddie Snowden, the terrorists know a lot more about the process that the United States uses in tracking terrorist communications, perhaps al-Qaeda is pulling our chain with this recent staged chatter ... and using it to verify what they have learned.
- The Obama administration seldom does anything that is not driven by political considerations. Why should this hair-on-fire stage performance be any different.
But, then again, I don't want to be proven wrong as a result of more spilled American blood.
Afterward: For some comments along this same line of thought see: The Powerline Blog.
What would Mitt have done?
ReplyDelete