At the risk of being labeled a fruitcake, yesterday on a
Skype call with friends, I suggested that Sarah Palin might be a good Presidential candidate
for the Republicans in 2016. Here is my
logic:
American voters, as a rule, are clearly “uninformed.” In 2008, they emotionally chose Barack Obama
because he was, to use Harry Reid’s words, a “light-skinned African-American
with no Negro dialect.” This was to
prove to themselves that this country was no longer racist … and that, by
electing Obama, the stain of slavery would be forever cleansed. And then they re-elected him in 2012 …
despite the fact that he had proven himself of poor Presidential timber … using
much of the same mindless naivete.
Now as we approach 2016, I believe that emotion will once
again rule the American electorate … and this time they will feel that it is a
woman’s turn to be President … independent of any consideration of competence
or character. I think that this will be
the Democrat party’s strategy in putting forward Hillary Clinton. It is her turn … and, barring any major
scandal (maybe even with one), she should be a shoe in.
I believe them right and the only defense against such an
emotional appeal would be for the Republicans to also proffer a woman … perhaps Sarah
Palin. Yes, I know that much of the
American media would have a field day sniping at her … much as they did in
2008. But then they did exactly the same when
Ronald Reagan was nominated … painting him as a know-nothing thespian … and he
was elected in a landslide. Since 2008, Ms. Palin has been annealed in the oven of national politics and has made
virtually no blunders. I’m sure she has
even read some periodicals.
Ms. Palin clearly is a true-blue conservative … much like
Reagan was … and unfortunately, no male Republican candidate would be able to
debate Hillary on even terms. Even Chris
Christie, I’m afraid would be hobbled in his confrontational style when pitted
against Hillary. All she would need to
do would be to mist up and Christie would be toast. On the other hand, Sarah Palin would be on level
ground and would be able to point out Hillary’s many fault lines without
appearing sexist. She should be able
to hold her own in any debate ... and Hillary would get mushy at her own
peril.
Sometimes political parties need to go with the popular flow … and
actually eat some of last-Christmas’s fruitcake. It might even taste good.
Afterward: If Sarah Palin were to run, she obviously would have a long row to hoe ... if this brickbat is an example ... see: Breitbart Reference.
Afterward: If Sarah Palin were to run, she obviously would have a long row to hoe ... if this brickbat is an example ... see: Breitbart Reference.
Most Democrats would LOVE it if the GOP nominated Palin. Hillery would wipe the floor with her in a debate, heck, even Biden can beat her in a stand up debate - as he proved in 2008.
ReplyDelete