The Miami
Heat have won the National Basketball Associations (NBA) title for the second
straight year … see: AP Story. I haven’t been interested nor watched the seven games that it took, but have
been enjoying the over-heated sports theater surrounding this series. Clearly, the public has been caught up in the
drama of the tense back and forth between Miami and the San Antonio Spurs and
the TV stations and team owners have hit the jackpot with advertising,
attendance, and sports paraphernalia revenues.
It’s capitalism at its very best.
But is it legitimate? Clearly LaBron James is the dominant and
determinant player and, I believe, could have, if he really wanted,
caused the Heat to sweep the series in four. But
why try too hard when there is so much lucre to be gained from a seven-game series? I predicted that this series would take seven
games just as I predicted that Miami
would win game seven. This is
reminiscence of the baseball World Series sham that developed during the early part of
the twentieth century. Basically, the players
then were colluding and purposely extending the World Series to fatten their
paychecks. The baseball leagues and fans
eventually caught on and, to cure things, players were only paid for the first
four games … see: Wiki Answers.
Perhaps the equivalent will
now happen in the NBA? But I kind of
doubt it …
No comments:
Post a Comment