Monday, March 19, 2012

Voter Fraud


To the cheaters go the spoils. 

We sneer in this country when we see the massive voter fraud in Russia (more votes for Putin in some areas than there were registered voters) or Venezuela (organized voter thuggery).  But we should be careful in our high-mindedness ... for we are rapidly becoming equally corrupt ... so much so that I fear our democracy is in jeopardy.  We have seen the seedy side of "community organizers" in the exposure of ACORN's shenanigans (see: Many Instances).  We have seen local elections in Chicago and Nevada that were clearly rigged.  We have even had nation-wide elections that are suspected of to have been stolen ... JFK's in particular.  Democrats decry George W. Bush's first election as being decided by the U.S. Supreme Court ... but would have been perfectly happy to have it determined by the clearly-biased Florida Supreme Court.

I have recently read a compelling blog that deals with this subject in a plain-talk manner.  May I suggest that you give it a gander.  It's not very long ... see: The Diplomad.  And, if you like this former U.S. diplomat's  (and UCLA graduate's) style, go back from time to time to read his insightful analysis of the world and national situation.  I have a generic link to his blog on this blog.  (He is about to spill the inside poop on Hillary's tenure at Foggy Bottom.)

Back to voter fraud.  This country is overwhelmingly Conservative (see: Gallup Survey), yet Liberals keep winning elections where they probably shouldn't.  There can be few explanations for these inconsistencies other than Democrat-organized voter fraud.  (There might even be some cheating on the part of Republicans ... particularly in the South.  This too is inexcusable.)  Although many citizens understand this is happening, they do nothing.  And, when they do something to stop voter fraud, they are charged with "voter suppression." 

This electoral misfeasance is a grievous wrong and needs to be remedied if we have any chance of maintaining our Democratic institutions.  Perhaps a political party might be charged under the federal Racketeer-Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) statutes?  (You know which one I mean.)  Wouldn't that be a breath of fresh air?  Perhaps even, if Romney can win the Presidency this fall (despite expected massive voter fraud), his adiministration might begin the thankless job of cleaning these Aegean stables?  And returning us to a nation that our founding fathers would recognize.

6 comments:

  1. This country is not overwhelmingly conservative. Add the Libs and the Moderates and you get 70% --that is overwhelmingly NON-conservative! Most of us feel that voter fraud is a red herring issue trumped-up by the losers. How come nobody has been charged with any voter fraud in national elections? No proof? No case.

    ReplyDelete
  2. See:
    http://rottenacorn.com/activityMap.html
    and:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/05/us/indiana-secretary-of-state-convicted-in-voter-fraud-case.html (a Republican)
    and:
    http://www.news-journal.com/opinion/forum/coulter-election-fraud-and-leftists/article_1c946574-2331-57d5-930d-8cce6b2df33a.html
    and:
    http://usnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/08/10607970-new-mayor-of-sunland-park-new-mexico-cant-legally-enter-city-hall
    and:
    http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/opinion/jack-kelly/voter-fraud-is-real-224753/

    etc., etc. I think you have Google ...so please use it next time before you make these silly claims.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And DEN ... please look at that Gallup poll chart again.

    In 2009 it was 40% Conservative and only 21% Liberal. Only a true-blue Liberal would assume that all the Moderates were non-Conservatives. To me, Moderates are rudderless sailboats in a political windstorm. They will put into any port that offers them a hot cup of Starbucks coffee and feigned acceptance from their peers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To me, conservatives are tethered bouys in a shallow harbor, unable to move to a new position so they can get a clearer view of the landscape or deeper waters.

      My assuption that Moderates are non-conservatives is based on word meaning and logic. If they were Conservatives then they would not call themselves Moderates. Thus the "overwhelmingly conservative" statement is just a silly claim.

      Delete
  4. And to me, a 2:1 ratio between Conservative and Liberal is overwhelming. But then what do I know about mathematics ... I'm just a silly tethered buoy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Clang, clang....

    ReplyDelete