tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35852320.post5998042328635913211..comments2024-03-26T08:07:43.642-05:00Comments on Fletcher's Castoria: Unsolicited Mail-in BallotsGeorge W. Pottshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15559745926094694653noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35852320.post-78305222397357121372022-11-16T11:02:19.508-05:002022-11-16T11:02:19.508-05:00See: https://electionfraud20.org/in-detail/maricop...See: https://electionfraud20.org/in-detail/maricopa-arizona-forensic-audit-report-results/George W. Pottshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15559745926094694653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35852320.post-6169187471253095872022-11-15T15:19:45.818-05:002022-11-15T15:19:45.818-05:00But it WAS denied by Maricopa because they could n...But it WAS denied by Maricopa because they could not show evidence of their allegations. Judge fined them for not producing a shred of evidence. The entire audit was dismissed and the company folded rather than show their work. Look it up! <br />You still avoid the distinction between unsolicited and solicited. <br />The so-called fraud is a projection of your gullible, corrupt mindset. DENhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06542797650497025693noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35852320.post-70107306207259934872022-11-15T15:00:08.254-05:002022-11-15T15:00:08.254-05:00Always and reliably, you employ weasel words … not...Always and reliably, you employ weasel words … not “suspicions of fraud” … actual fraud. As has always been the case, opportunity begets execution. The Maricopa audit was an exhaustive indictment of what happened there. Had you read it, you would not have sheepishly followed the debunking media narrative. It’s statistics, scrupulously collected by dozens of workers, cannot be denied … no matter who the contractor was.George W. Pottshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15559745926094694653noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35852320.post-29683499476175066662022-11-15T13:56:28.074-05:002022-11-15T13:56:28.074-05:00There is no question that unsolicited mail-in ball...There is no question that unsolicited mail-in ballots invites suspicion of fraud. <br /> Despite that, no evidence has been discovered that would support the denier allegations about the 2020 presidential election. Your oft-repeated claim about the 60,000 envelopes was never proven. When the Cyber Ninjas were ordered to produce documentation for this claim, they could not. Shortly thereafter they went out of business. <br /> Your argument sidesteps whether solicited mail-in and early voting actually leads to fraud. Again, no one has proven a case in court to support the claims of 2020 deniers. <br />Stop welshing on the bet you lost!DENhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06542797650497025693noreply@blogger.com