In figure skating's long programs there are two major scoring criteria -- "technical merit" or degree of difficulty of the tricks and "presentation" or style -- the costume, correct back arch, graceful arm movements, skater's synchronization to the music, etc.
Judging President Trump's performance this way gives him high marks on technical merit -- tax reform, deregulation, economic growth, defeating ISIS, employment growth, reforming and restoring international alliances, pushing back on our enemies, immigration law enforcement, restoring a conservative tone to our judicial system, starting to rationalize our healthcare insurance system, etc. But it is on the style front where he receives the most demerits. In fact, many of his critics would prefer to judge him solely on style ... and do. He is petulant, He is self aggrandizing. He demeans his enemies ruthlessly. He is a sexual predator. He is impulsive.
Trump's governance is in stark contrast with his predecessor's ... which was primarily style with few heavy lifts ... most of which, when attempted at all (immigration policies, Obamacare, Iran nuclear deal, restoring robust economic growth, North Korea containment, Paris climate accord, improved race relations, TPP, etc.), were mismashed ... not even a single Salchow. It was Obama's smooth style that won him his fans.
Or to use the Texas slight (and muddle this metaphor), he was all hat and no cattle. Style-less Trump is, in my opinion, all cattle and no hat. If I can't have both, I'll take technical merit over style.
23 comments:
Several of Trump's technical points were simply maintaining the momentum of the previous administration, one that had to engineer recovery from the the disastrous mess he assumed from the previous administration. Other of Trump's technical points are debatable: is deregulation hard to do? Are our international alliances really improved? And is a strict conservative constitutional judiciary in any way progressive?
If deregulation so easy to do, why didn't B.O. Do it? Certainly our relations with Israel, Saudi Arabia, Japam, Egypt, Poland, Hungary, South Korea are better ... even Russia and China? And NATO may not be happier, but they are responding to Trump's criticism.
Obama did not do deregulation because he did regulation. It takes time and effort to put up stop signs and speed limits, while it takes just a day to tear down all of them.
I cannot speak to Trump's foreign policy status because I cannot use any source for information other than Fox News that you would consider credible.
"GNP Sped Limit ... 2% per year"
- tax reform (Aggrandizing the rich),
- deregulation (Enriching oil companies),
- economic growth (already in progress),
- defeating ISIS (already in progress),
- employment growth (already in progress), - reforming and restoring international alliances (Making the world laugh at us),
- pushing back on our enemies (Really? What was accomplished?),
- immigration law enforcement, (kicking-out kids?)
- restoring a conservative tone to our judicial system (By nominating a bunch of know-nothings),
- starting to rationalize our healthcare insurance system (by kicking millions out of coverage),
- etc (Turning the White house into a reality show that you don't want to watch).
When you Obama/Hillary haters come to your senses, perhaps you will see that the new Emperor is naked.
And the distruction of America was already in progress. Fortunately, the Emperor is turning things around. (I'd rather not see him naked though.)
I'd rather if you would try to explain away Obama's screw-ups ... instead of falsely claiming Trump is just riding on B.O.'s coat tails.
GDP is the more common metric. Two percent per year is way better than the minus numbers when he took over from Bush and Cheney. Granted that a bit of loosening does let off the brakes but taking down stop signs is overreach. Everyone will go a lot faster and some people will die — that’s the price of unfettered freedoms.
All the deregulation and tax changes do not immediately result in higher revenues and employment.
Bah, humbug! I never asserted that the economic gains "in progress" were Obama's doing. I do assert that no one who enjoys common sense believes that Trump has turned this ocean liner around in one year, when most of his energy has been spent on loony tweets and golf.
Remind us of few of the forces that were destroying America.
I am not sure that the designated shithole countries can spin the latest outreach by DJT to a positive.
So freedoms must be fettered? And I know you know that Bush '43 's sin was not reining ing Barney Frank's idiotic notion of everyone owning a home ... and the Fannie Mae Ponzi scheme that grew out of this insanity.
Fox News usually gets the news right. I seldom watch its opinion programs except "The Five".
Open borders, BLM, crushing regulations, ANTIFA, political correctness, unfair foreign trade, "leading from behind", the Clinton Foundation, politization of the DOJ, FBI, IRS, EPA, NASA, etc., outdated tax code ... Enough? (There are lots more.)
And i know you know that collateralized debt obligations rated as AAA because the bankers were paying the ratings agencies was not Barney Frank:s doings. Some fetters in both the financial instruments and the rating process would have squelched the FNMA fires
TheFive. I watch it too. I am surprised that Waters, Perino, and Gutfeld allow Juan Williams to express a slightly left of right position on anything. But are these three (and whatshername) as intellectual and informed as you want opinion spouters to be?
There has been a substantial wall on the Mexican border for decades, and there has never been a wall on the Canadian border. If you build one, it will only challenge who want to cross it to go over, under or around it. BLM? please... “crushing”? You would not have ANTIFA without FA.
The big banks and rating agencies drove the getaway car. Barney and Fannie robbed the bank.
Left of tight is center ... cummon, I sometime think that Juan doesn't even believe what he says.
FA?
FAscism
Post a Comment