According to Hillary Clinton's sworn testimony at last week's Benghazi hearings, Chris Stevens did not have her private e-mail address so that he might send a plea for extra security directly to her. However, it was also revealed during her testimony that Sid Blumenthal had sent Hillary e-mails to this same address that contained certain intelligence on Libya that Hillary then forwarded to Chris Stevens for comment. How in Lucifer's name could Chris Stevens reply with any comments to Hillary if he didn't have her return private e-mail address?
We all know how e-mail systems work. Apparently, Hillary Clinton has perjured herself again for the umpteenth time.
Am I wrong?
3 comments:
As usual, the answer is Yes. Mainly because you are asking the wrong (and trivial) question about whether Reply-to-sender works when one of the emails is "private."
You should be asking why the GOP cannot see that it is making an ass out of itself by continuing to ask what music was played on the Titanic on that fateful night.
If Republicans really cared about American Lives they might support reasonable gun control, affordable health care and highway safety.
You forgot "Black Lives Matter."
And on the Titanic, we already know it was "Nearer My God to Thee."
Post a Comment